Technical Writing Intake Form

Please remove this client intake form insights section before publishing.

This Client Intake Form is designed to gather precise requirements for User Manuals, API Documentation, and White Papers, ensuring the final deliverables align with the client’s expectations. Below is a breakdown of its structure, purpose, and key considerations.

1. Why This Form is Effective

The form:
Standardizes client onboarding – Ensures no critical details are missed.
Reduces back-and-forth – Captures all necessary information upfront.
Sets clear expectations – Defines scope, audience, and deliverables early.
Improves efficiency – Helps writers estimate effort, pricing, and timelines accurately.

2. Breakdown of Key Sections

A. Client & Project Information

• Purpose: Basic details to initiate communication and project tracking.
• Why It Matters: Ensures proper follow-ups and deadline management.

B. Service Selection (Checklist-Based)

• User Manuals: Focus on end-user clarity, structured steps, and troubleshooting.
• API Documentation: Targets developers, requiring precise technical details.
• White Papers: Geared toward business or technical decision-makers, requiring research-backed insights.
• Why It Matters: Helps tailor the writing style, depth, and format.

C. Detailed Project Expectations (Critical for Quality Output)

i. Target Audience

• Developers → Need code snippets, API specs, authentication details.
• End-users → Require simple, step-by-step guides with visuals.
• Executives → Prefer high-level insights (white papers, ROI analysis).
• Why It Matters: Dictates tone, terminology, and complexity.

ii. Content Requirements

• Tone:
  Technical (API docs) vs. Conversational (user manuals) vs. Persuasive (white papers).
• Visuals:
  Diagrams, screenshots, or videos improve comprehension.
• Brand Compliance:
  Ensures consistency with company branding.

iii. Existing Materials

• If the client has drafts or competitor references, it accelerates content structuring.

iv. Integration & Distribution

• Hosting on a knowledge base? (e.g., Zendesk, ReadTheDocs)
• PDF vs. Web Format? (Affects hyperlinking, interactivity)
• Multi-language support? (Requires localization planning)

v. Review & Approval Process

• Identifies stakeholders to avoid bottlenecks.
• Sets revision expectations upfront.

D. Additional Questions (For Deeper Clarity)

1. Primary Goal:
   Is the doc for training, sales enablement, compliance, or developer adoption?
2. Compliance Needs:
   GDPR, HIPAA, or industry-specific legal disclaimers.
3. Ongoing Maintenance:
   Will updates be needed post-delivery? (Useful for retainer models)
4. SEO Optimization:
   Needed if publishing online (helps with discoverability).
5. Tooling & Formats:
   Markdown for developers, Confluence for internal wikis, etc.

E. Budget & Timeline

• Helps in resource allocation and project prioritization.
• Fixed vs. hourly pricing depends on project scope clarity.

3. Best Practices When Using This Form

Send it before the kickoff call – Lets clients prepare answers in advance.
Use it as a discovery tool – Ask follow-up questions based on responses.
Attach it to contracts – Ensures alignment on scope before work begins.
Update it over time – Refine based on recurring client needs.

4. Potential Customizations

• For SaaS Companies: Add a section on product versioning (if API docs need updates per release).
• For Hardware Manufacturers: Include safety warnings & compliance standards.
• For Agencies: Add a competitor analysis preference (if positioning against rivals).

5. Conclusion

This intake form ensures clarity, efficiency, and alignment between the client and the technical writer. By capturing detailed requirements upfront, it minimizes revisions and ensures high-quality, audience-tailored documentation.