This section establishes the foundational property characteristics and parking structure metadata essential for infrastructure planning. Accurate data here determines installation complexity, equipment specifications, and regulatory applicability.
Property Universal Identifier (e.g., Asset Tag, Portfolio Code)
Complete Physical Address & Geospatial Coordinates
Primary Building Classification
Office Complex
Industrial Warehouse
Mixed-Use Development
Research Facility
Data Center
Manufacturing Plant
Distribution Center
Other Commercial
Year of Original Construction
Last Major Electrical System Renovation Year
Total Number of Parking Levels (including sub-levels and rooftop)
Total Parking Capacity (all spaces)
Proposed EV-Ready Parking Spaces (quantity)
Parking Structure Construction Type
Cast-in-Place Concrete
Precast Concrete
Steel Frame with Concrete Deck
Post-Tensioned Concrete
Hybrid Structure
Surface Lot Only
Does the parking structure have existing electrical conduit pathways?
Minimum Ceiling Height in Proposed Installation Zone (in meters)
Maximum Ambient Temperature Range (recorded historical high, in Celsius)
Minimum Ambient Temperature Range (recorded historical low, in Celsius)
Is the parking structure located in a designated flood-risk zone?
Are there any height or weight restrictions for equipment delivery to the installation zone?
Accessibility & Proximity Factors (select all applicable)
Within 50m of main electrical room
Adjacent to ADA-accessible parking spaces
Near existing network infrastructure (fiber/cellular)
Close to building management system controllers
Visible to security cameras
Proximity to emergency exits
Near freight elevator for maintenance access
Upload Parking Structure Architectural Drawings (PDF format, showing proposed EV zone)
Upload Photographs of Proposed Installation Area (minimum 4 angles showing structural features)
Describe any structural load-bearing limitations or seismic retrofit requirements that may affect equipment mounting:
This section performs a comprehensive electrical capacity audit to determine if the existing infrastructure can support high-voltage EV charging loads without compromising power quality or safety. Include all supporting calculations and third-party engineering assessments.
Primary Electrical Service Voltage & Configuration (e.g., 480V/277V 3-phase)
Total Transformer Capacity Serving the Property (in kVA)
Current Peak Demand Load (measured maximum, in kW)
Historical Average Load Factor (percentage, 0-100)
Spare Transformer Capacity Available (in kW)
Has a formal load flow study been conducted by a licensed electrical engineer?
Electrical Panel Audit Matrix - Document all panels that could potentially feed EV charging equipment
Panel ID | Panel Location | Panel Rating (Amps) | Current Load (Amps) | Spare Capacity (Amps) | Distance to EV Zone (meters) | Estimated Upgrade Cost | Suitable for EV Load? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PP-3A | Level 2 Electrical Room | 400 | 320 | 80 | 45 | $0.00 | Yes | |
PP-5B | Level 5 Mechanical Space | 600 | 580 | 20 | 25 | $0.00 | ||
Total Proposed EV Charging Capacity (in kW, sum of all chargers)
Calculated Simultaneous Demand Factor (percentage, 0-100)
Will the installation require a new dedicated transformer?
Are harmonic filters or power factor correction equipment required?
Calculated Voltage Drop at Farthest Charger (percentage)
Overall Electrical Capacity Risk Assessment
Low Risk - Sufficient spare capacity with margin
Medium Risk - Adequate capacity but minimal margin
High Risk - Requires significant infrastructure upgrades
Critical Risk - Inadequate capacity, major overhaul required
Describe any utility-imposed export limitations or demand response program requirements that affect operation:
Upload Single-Line Diagram showing proposed electrical connection point
Upload Third-Party Electrical Engineering Peer Review Letter
This section defines the metering accuracy, payment processing infrastructure, and network connectivity architecture required for commercial operation. Includes cybersecurity, data privacy, and integration with enterprise systems.
Primary Metering Standard Required
Revenue-Grade Accuracy (±0.5% or better)
Commercial-Grade Accuracy (±1%)
Internal Monitoring Only (±2%)
Utility-Owned Primary Meter
Will sub-metering be implemented for individual charger billing?
Payment & Access Methods to be Supported (select all)
Mobile App (proprietary)
Mobile App (third-party aggregator)
RFID Card/Key Fob
Credit Card Reader (EMV compliant)
Contactless Payment (NFC)
Building Access Card Integration
Fleet Management System API
Guest/Voucher Code System
No Payment (free charging)
Network Connectivity Primary Backhaul
Dedicated Fiber Optic
Existing Building Ethernet
4G/5G Cellular with SIM
Wi-Fi Mesh Network
LoRaWAN
Power Line Communication (PLC)
Hybrid Redundant Connection
Is redundant network connectivity required for 99.5% uptime SLA?
Backend Software Platform/Charge Point Management System (CPMS) Provider
Will the CPMS integrate with existing Building Management System (BMS)?
Will user data be stored on-site or in cloud infrastructure?
Cybersecurity Measures Implemented (select all that apply)
End-to-end encryption (TLS 1.3)
VPN tunneling
Firewall isolation (DMZ)
Intrusion Detection System
Regular penetration testing
SOC 2 Type II certified platform
ISO 27001 compliance
Multi-factor authentication
Payment Card Industry (PCI DSS) compliance
Estimated Monthly Network & Software Licensing Fees per Charging Port
Average Transaction Processing Fee Percentage
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Projection - 5 Year Financial Model
Cost Category | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | 5-Year Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Network Connectivity Fees | $1,200.00 | $1,200.00 | $1,200.00 | $1,200.00 | $1,200.00 | $6,000.00 | |
Software Licensing | $2,400.00 | $2,400.00 | $2,400.00 | $2,400.00 | $2,400.00 | $12,000.00 | |
Payment Processing | $1,800.00 | $2,100.00 | $2,500.00 | $2,900.00 | $3,400.00 | $12,700.00 | |
$0.00 | |||||||
$0.00 | |||||||
$0.00 | |||||||
$0.00 | |||||||
$0.00 | |||||||
$0.00 | |||||||
$0.00 |
Will Open Charge Point Protocol (OCPP) be implemented for interoperability?
Upload Network Architecture Diagram showing all connections and security zones
Upload CPMS API Documentation & Data Flow Diagrams
This section addresses critical life safety concerns, thermal runaway propagation prevention, and multi-standard code compliance. EV charging presents unique fire risks due to high-energy batteries and continuous electrical load. Complete documentation is mandatory for insurance and regulatory approval.
Distance from Proposed Charger Location to Nearest Fire Hydrant (in meters)
Distance to Nearest Hazardous Material Storage (e.g., flammable liquids, in meters)
Is the parking structure equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system?
Will thermal runaway detection systems (gas/voltage/temperature sensors) be installed?
Minimum Ventilation Rate in Proposed Zone (air changes per hour, ACH)
Are there floor drains or spill containment systems for battery electrolyte/coolant?
Code Compliance Matrix - Rate adherence level for each applicable standard (1=Non-compliant, 5=Exceeds requirements)
Non-Compliant | Partially Compliant | Compliant | Compliant with Minor Enhancements | Exceeds Requirements | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electrical Code (wiring, grounding, overcurrent protection) | |||||
Fire Code (clearances, suppression, detection) | |||||
Building Code (structural, accessibility) | |||||
Environmental Code (spill containment, ventilation) | |||||
Accessibility Standards (reach ranges, clear floor space) | |||||
Energy Code (efficiency, standby power) | |||||
Cybersecurity/Privacy Standards (data protection) |
Has a third-party fire safety engineering review been completed?
Describe Emergency Response Plan including: 1) Evacuation routes, 2) Emergency power shutdown procedure, 3) Fire department access, 4) Post-incident recovery protocol:
Will the installation require notification to property insurance carrier?
Overall Fire & Life Safety Risk Classification
Minimal Risk - Standard commercial installation
Low Risk - Minor enhancements required
Moderate Risk - Significant detection/suppression upgrades needed
High Risk - Major fire safety overhaul required
Unacceptable Risk - Installation not recommended without major structural changes
Upload Fire Marshal Pre-Approval Letter or Code Interpretation Ruling
Upload Emergency Shutdown Procedure & Single-Line Diagram with E-Stop locations
Are there any underground storage tanks (USTs) or contaminated soil concerns in the installation area?
This final section captures executive-level approval, financial authorization, and formal risk acceptance. Both Asset Manager and Chief Electrical Engineer must independently review all preceding sections, validate calculations, and provide signed authorization before procurement or installation begins.
Asset Manager Full Name
Asset Manager Employee ID
Asset Manager Review Completion Timestamp
Asset Manager Risk Assessment - Rate each risk factor (1=Very Low, 5=Very High)
Financial Risk (ROI uncertainty, cost overruns) | |
Operational Risk (downtime, maintenance complexity) | |
Reputational Risk (user dissatisfaction, public perception) | |
Regulatory Risk (code changes, non-compliance penalties) | |
Safety Risk (fire, electrical hazards) | |
Technology Obsolescence Risk (charger standards evolution) |
Asset Manager Justification & Business Case Summary (include expected ROI, payback period, and strategic value):
Asset Manager Approves Capital Expenditure?
Asset Manager Digital Signature & Authorization
Chief Electrical Engineer Full Name
Chief Electrical Engineer License/Certification Number
Chief Electrical Engineer Review Completion Timestamp
Chief Electrical Engineer Technical Confidence Assessment - Rate confidence in each technical domain (1=Very Unconfident, 5=Very Confident)
Electrical capacity calculations accuracy | |
Power quality and harmonic analysis | |
Safety system design adequacy | |
Code compliance interpretation | |
Network architecture robustness | |
Equipment selection appropriateness | |
Maintenance plan viability |
Chief Electrical Engineer Technical Qualifications & Peer Review Statement:
Chief Electrical Engineer Approves Technical Design & Safety Protocols?
Chief Electrical Engineer Digital Signature & Professional Seal
Proposed Installation Start Date
Target Commissioning & Handover Date
Post-Installation Testing & Acceptance Criteria Matrix
Test Category | Test Method | Acceptance Criteria | Scheduled Date | Completed | Responsible Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Insulation Resistance | Megger test @ 1000VDC | >100 MΩ | 8/15/2025 | Electrical Contractor | ||
Ground Fault Protection | Inject fault current | <100ms trip | 8/16/2025 | Commissioning Agent | ||
Load Bank Test | 80% rated load for 4hrs | Stable voltage ±5% | 8/20/2025 | Engineer of Record | ||
Has a maintenance and operations manual been prepared?
Final Conditions & Qualifications of Approval (if any):
I acknowledge that this approval constitutes formal acceptance of all technical, financial, and operational risks associated with this installation as documented herein.