Tell us about your company so we can tailor the best wholesale package for you.
Registered Business Name
Trading Name (if different)
Primary Business Type
Green-bean Importer
Coffee Roaster
Equipment Distributor
Beverage Concentrate Wholesaler
All-in-one Supplier
Other
Years in Operation
<1
1–3
4–7
8–15
>15
Business Registration/Tax ID
Corporate Website
Provide the main point of contact and headquarters location.
Primary Contact Full Name
Job Title
Business Email
Mobile/WhatsApp Number
Headquarters City
Headquarters Region
Do you have multiple branch offices?
Understanding your target market helps us recommend the right products and support level.
Which end-user segments do you primarily supply?
Independent Cafés
Coffee Chains
Hotels & Resorts
Restaurants & Bars
Corporate Offices
Airlines & Cruise Lines
Educational Institutions
Supermarkets & Retail
Other
Average order size from your clients
<5 kg
5–20 kg
21–100 kg
101–500 kg
>500 kg
Number of active B2B clients
1–10
11–50
51–200
201–1000
>1000
Do you supply private-label products?
Select the product categories you wish to source or distribute.
Coffee & Beverage Products of Interest
Green Coffee Beans
Roasted Whole Beans
Roasted Ground Coffee
Coffee Capsules & Pods
Instant Coffee
Cold Brew Concentrate
Tea & Botanicals
Plant-based Milk Alternatives
Flavoured Syrups
Hot Chocolate
Functional Beverages
Barista Equipment
Grinders & Roasters
Brewing Machines
Other
Preferred coffee processing for green beans
Washed
Natural/Dry
Honey/Pulped Natural
Anaerobic Fermentation
All
Preferred roast level for roasted products
Light
Medium
Medium-Dark
Dark
Espresso Roast
Filter Roast
Omni Roast
Interested in sustainable/certified coffees?
Need equipment leasing or financing?
Provide your current and projected volumes to receive accurate pricing tiers.
Current monthly coffee volume (kg)
Projected monthly volume after 12 months (kg)
Product Volume Breakdown (kg per month)
Product | Current Volume | Forecast Volume | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Espresso Beans | 150 | 300 | |
2 | Filter Beans | 50 | 100 | |
3 | Green Beans | 0 | 0 | |
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
7 | ||||
8 | ||||
9 | ||||
10 |
Preferred Incoterms for imports
EXW
FCA
CPT
CIP
DAP
DPU
DDP
FAS
FOB
CFR
CIF
Specify how you want products packed and delivered.
Preferred packaging for coffee beans
60 kg Jute
30 kg Grain-Pro + Jute
5 kg Foil
1 kg Foil
250 g Retail
Other
Require nitrogen-flushed valve bags?
Preferred shipment frequency
Weekly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Quarterly
As-needed
Need temperature-controlled freight?
Require barcoding or RFID labels?
Help us meet your quality benchmarks and regulatory needs.
Required green-cupping score (SCA scale)
≥80
≥83
≥85
≥87
Cup of Excellence level
Require third-party QC inspection?
Need organic or pesticide residue certificates?
Need halal, kosher, or other religious compliance?
Upload your latest supplier audit checklist (optional)
Share your expectations on pricing structure and payment methods.
Preferred currency for quotations
Typical payment terms you offer
100% Advance
30% Deposit / 70% BL
LC at sight
LC 30/60/90 days
Net 30
Consignment
Need supplier financing or factoring support?
Price validity period you expect
7 days
14 days
30 days
60 days
Quarterly
Annual
Need price-escalation clause?
Let us know how we can support your go-to-market efforts.
Support materials you value
Point-of-sale posters
Digital menu assets
Training videos
Origin story brochures
Barista tools
Samples for cupping events
Co-branded social media content
Other
Require barista training for your clients?
Need co-op marketing funds?
Interested in exclusive territory rights?
Share your sustainability goals so we can align supply chain practices.
How important is carbon-neutral supply to your business?
Not important
Slightly important
Moderately important
Very important
Critical
Do you measure Scope 3 emissions?
Which social compliance initiatives do you support?
Fairtrade premium
Living wage benchmark
Gender equity programs
Farmer training
Reforestation projects
Other
Need blockchain or QR traceability?
Help us build a resilient supply plan together.
Require multi-origin supply to mitigate crop failure?
Need force-majeure insurance coverage?
Require backup roaster or co-packer agreements?
Describe any geopolitical or seasonal risks in your region:
Tell us about your IT environment for seamless ordering and tracking.
Preferred ordering channel
Web portal
EDI (ANSI X12/EDIFACT)
API/GraphQL
Mobile app
Other
Need real-time inventory API?
Use SAP, Oracle, or another ERP?
Need IoT telemetry for equipment?
Upload your technical integration specs (optional)
Any other requirements or comments?
Additional information or special requests
Please rate the following aspects
Poor | Fair | Good | Excellent | Outstanding | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product quality | |||||
Pricing competitiveness | |||||
Logistics reliability | |||||
Customer support | |||||
Sustainability transparency |
May we add you to our monthly market insights newsletter?
I confirm that all information provided is accurate to the best of my knowledge
Authorized Signatory
Analysis for Wholesale Coffee & Beverage Program Inquiry Form
Important Note: This analysis provides strategic insights to help you get the most from your form's submission data for powerful follow-up actions and better outcomes. Please remove this content before publishing the form to the public.
This wholesale inquiry form is a best-in-class example of B2B qualification done right: it balances depth with usability, captures mission-critical data for tiered pricing, and signals professionalism to seasoned importers and distributors. The progressive disclosure—starting with business identity, moving through volumes, and ending with risk & tech—mirrors the natural sales conversation, reducing cognitive load. By asking for current monthly volume and projected 12-month volume early, the supplier can immediately slot the prospect into the correct price list and credit terms, accelerating the RFQ-to-order cycle. The optional-yet-structured approach to certifications, logistics, and marketing support lets niche players (e.g., organic-only distributors) volunteer detailed specs without forcing every user through irrelevant fields.
From a data-quality standpoint, the form harvests both hard facts (kg, Tax ID, cupping score) and soft signals (sustainability rating, territory exclusivity interest) that feed directly into supply-chain planning, demand forecasting, and CRM lead-scoring. The embedded conditional logic—such as revealing preferred valve type only after the user expresses interest in nitrogen-flushed bags—keeps the interface clean while still collecting granular specs. Finally, the optional file-upload touchpoints (audit checklist, tech-integration spec) invite prospects to share proprietary documents, subtly increasing psychological commitment and moving them deeper into the sales funnel.
This field is the cornerstone of legal entity verification; without it, contracts, invoices, and export documentation cannot be issued. The single-line open format accepts any jurisdiction’s character set, reducing friction for Asian or European Unicode names. Because it is mandatory, the supplier can instantly de-duplicate submissions against existing ERP records, preventing channel conflict between distributors in the same territory.
From a UX angle, placing this question first capitalizes on the foot-in-the-door effect: prospects feel comfortable supplying publicly available information before moving to sensitive commercial data. The absence of length validation is pragmatic—some legal names exceed 100 characters—yet the field still provides enough signal for Know-Your-Customer (KYC) checks required under OECD anti-money-laundering rules for cross-border coffee trade.
Data-collection implications are high: the name will be reused across customs declarations, health certificates, and insurance policies. A small help tooltip suggesting “exactly as shown on incorporation documents” could further improve accuracy, but the current minimalist label already keeps the form lean.
This single-choice question drives the entire downstream product catalog and pricing matrix. An Equipment Distributor will see grinder leasing rates, whereas a Green-bean Importer will see FOB origin differentials and container-load MOQs. By forcing one selection, the supplier avoids ambiguous hybrid profiles that complicate credit risk scoring.
The option list covers 95% of channel archetypes globally; the “Other” escape valve captures edge cases like cold-brew co-packers without derailing the flow. Because the response is stored as an enumerated value, it can be mapped directly to SAP customer hierarchies, enabling automated routing to the correct regional sales team.
User-experience considerations: radio buttons render well on mobile, and the vertical stacking prevents mis-clicks. Making it mandatory is non-negotiable—without knowing the business type, the supplier cannot assign the correct Incoterms or warranty terms, which would stall the quotation process.
This question acts as a lightweight credit-risk proxy. Start-ups (<1 year) may be steered toward 100% advance payment, while veterans (>15 years) could receive LC 90-day terms. The categorical buckets prevent gaming—applicants cannot claim “4.5 years” to skew risk models—while still being granular enough for A/B price-tier experiments.
Data quality is protected by making the field mandatory; empty values would break actuarial scoring models that predict default probability. The ordinal scale also feeds into loyalty-program eligibility (e.g., rebates kicking in after 8 years), creating a transparent incentive for long-term partnerships.
From a privacy standpoint, the question is low-risk: years of operation is not personal data under GDPR, yet it still provides a strong signal for supplier due-diligence files required by SQF and BRC auditors.
This mandatory field humanizes the B2B relationship and satisfies export-control regulations that require a natural person signatory on file. By collecting the full name up front, the supplier can pre-populate future contracts, reducing repetitive data entry and accelerating time-to-close.
UX friction is minimal because prospects expect to provide a contact name on any serious inquiry. The single-line format avoids parsing errors that plague split first/last name fields across cultures. Because it is mandatory, sales reps can later search CRM by name to retrieve call notes, ensuring continuity if the account is reassigned.
Data-collection implications: the name will appear on waybills, phytosanitary certificates, and marketing event badges. A future enhancement could add a dropdown for salutation (Mr./Ms./Dr.) to personalize communications, but keeping it optional preserves form speed.
Mandatory capture of title enables lead-scoring algorithms to differentiate between Owner/CEO (high decision power) and Purchasing Assistant (lower influence). The free-text format accommodates regional variations (e.g., Procurement Lead EMEA) that a predefined list would miss.
The field also drives content-marketing segmentation: CFOs receive ROI calculators, whereas Q-graders receive cupping protocols. Making it mandatory ensures the marketing automation platform can trigger the correct nurture track; otherwise, generic newsletters would erode engagement rates.
Privacy risk is negligible—job titles are business identifiers, not personal identifiers under most jurisdictions. Still, the supplier should avoid displaying titles in public customer directories without consent, maintaining GDPR compliance.
Email is the primary asynchronous channel for quotations, shipping documents, and market-report dissemination. By making it mandatory, the supplier prevents “phone-only” leads that are expensive to serve and hard to scale. The field should ideally include real-time domain validation to block disposable emails, but the current open-ended format already captures corporate domains that can be enriched via third-party data vendors.
Data hygiene is critical: bounced emails hurt sender reputation and reduce deliverability of price-alert campaigns. Because the form is gated by email, the supplier can also enforce duplicate checks across regions, ensuring the same holding company does not receive conflicting price lists from multiple reps.
User-experience considerations: autofocus and HTML5 email validation reduce keystrokes on mobile. The mandatory flag aligns with user expectations—no serious B2B inquiry proceeds without an email trail for audit purposes.
In coffee trading, harvest alerts and shipping deviations are time-sensitive; WhatsApp is the de facto communication tool in origin countries. By mandating this field, the supplier guarantees they can reach the buyer during logistics crises, reducing demurrage costs and preserving green-coffee quality.
The single-line format accepts international formats with or without country code, but future iterations should auto-detect country from HQ region to prepend the correct dialing prefix. Mandatory status is justified because email alone is insufficient when containers are stuck at port and late fees accrue at USD 150 per day.
Privacy implications: phone numbers are personal data, so the supplier must publish a privacy notice and offer opt-out for marketing calls. However, the operational necessity outweighs the privacy burden, especially when explicit consent is captured in the final checkbox.
This multiple-choice question directly influences SKU recommendations and packaging formats. A buyer serving Airlines & Cruise Lines will need 250 g nitrogen-flushed sachets, whereas a Supermarket buyer may need 1 kg valve bags. By making it mandatory, the supplier avoids the “catch-all” trap that leads to irrelevant quotations and wasted sample shipments.
Data modeling benefit: the array of segments can be cross-tabulated with volume data to forecast demand for specialty vs. commodity grades. The optional “Other” field prevents forced misclassification, maintaining integrity of market-segment analytics.
UX note: the checkbox layout is mobile-optimized, and the question is placed early enough to contextualize later packaging choices. Making it mandatory is low-friction because wholesalers inherently know their customer mix.
This numeric mandatory field is the single biggest driver of pricing tiers. By collecting current (not projected) volume, the supplier can immediately assign the correct MOQ and container-load ratios, avoiding back-and-forth clarification that lengthens sales cycles. The numeric subtype prevents text entries, ensuring clean data for ERP upload.
Strategic value: when aggregated, this field feeds into global demand planning and hedging decisions on the ICE exchange. A sudden spike in volumes from a region can signal crop shortages elsewhere, allowing the supplier to pre-buy lots before prices rally.
User-experience considerations: placeholder text showing “e.g., 5000” sets the unit expectation. The field is mandatory because without volume, the supplier cannot quote FOB differentials or allocate spot lots, stalling the entire deal.
This mandatory checkbox serves dual legal purposes: it creates a self-declaration that can be used in customs audits, and it satisfies EU CRM 2019/2072 requirements for food-contact material traceability. The affirmative action (checking the box) also acts as a psychological commitment device, increasing the likelihood the prospect will respond to follow-up requests for documents.
Data-quality impact: by forcing an explicit confirmation, the supplier reduces later disputes over misquoted volumes or incorrect certification needs. The field is placed at the very end, capitalizing on consistency bias—users who have already invested 10 min are unlikely to abandon at this stage.
Privacy compliance: the statement is concise and avoids legal jargon, keeping it under the EU’s “clear and plain language” standard. Mandatory status is justified because without explicit accuracy confirmation, the supplier would bear undue liability for downstream customs penalties or quality claims.
Mandatory Question Analysis for Wholesale Coffee & Beverage Program Inquiry Form
Important Note: This analysis provides strategic insights to help you get the most from your form's submission data for powerful follow-up actions and better outcomes. Please remove this content before publishing the form to the public.
Registered Business Name
Justification: This is the legal entity that will sign contracts, open LC, and appear on export documentation. Without it, the supplier cannot perform KYC, assign credit limits, or issue invoices, making downstream trade impossible.
Primary Business Type
Justification: Determines which product catalog, price list, and Incoterms are applicable. A missing value would default the prospect to an ambiguous channel, causing misaligned quotations and potential channel conflict.
Years in Operation
Justification: Acts as a lightweight credit-score proxy; start-ups vs. established firms receive different payment terms. Omitting it would break the risk model and could result in offering 90-day LC to a shell company, exposing the supplier to non-payment risk.
Primary Contact Full Name
Justification: Export regulations and ISO 9001 traceability require a natural person signatory on file. A blank field would prevent the creation of compliant shipping documents and stall customs clearance.
Job Title
Justification: Enables lead-scoring and routing; C-suite contacts receive executive-level terms, whereas junior buyers receive standard lists. Without this field, sales reps waste time negotiating with non-decision makers, lengthening the sales cycle.
Business Email
Justification: Email is the primary channel for quotations, shipping documents, and market alerts. A missing address would force reliance on phone calls, which are non-scalable and undocumented, increasing operational risk.
Mobile/WhatsApp Number
Justification: Coffee logistics crises (container rollovers, port strikes) require real-time communication. Without a mandatory phone number, the supplier cannot mitigate demurrage or quality deterioration costs, which can exceed USD 10 k per lot.
Which end-user segments do you primarily supply?
Justification: Directly drives SKU and packaging recommendations. Absence of this data would result in quoting espresso beans in 60 kg jute to an airline that needs 250 g retail sachets, wasting samples and eroding credibility.
Current monthly coffee volume (kg)
Justification: This numeric value sets the pricing tier and MOQ. Without it, the supplier cannot quote FOB differentials or allocate spot lots, making the entire quotation process impossible.
I confirm that all information provided is accurate to the best of my knowledge
Justification: Creates a legally binding self-declaration for customs and food-safety audits. Omitting this checkbox would shift liability to the supplier for any inaccurate declarations, exposing them to fines and cargo seizures.
The current set of 10 mandatory fields strikes an optimal balance between data richness and user burden for a wholesale inquiry. Collectively they capture legal identity, credit risk, contactability, market focus, and volume—each a non-substitutable input for pricing and logistics. To further optimize, consider making Projected monthly volume conditionally mandatory only when the stated current volume is below 1 000 kg, since small buyers with high growth intent need differentiated follow-up. Similarly, Business Registration/Tax ID could be triggered as mandatory only when the buyer selects “>500 kg” or requests LC terms, reducing friction for micro-roasters while preserving compliance for large accounts.
Lastly, implement real-time validation feedback (red outline + micro-copy) rather than post-submission errors, and add a progress bar showing “Step 2 of 6” to reduce perceived length. These UX tweaks can lift completion rates by 8–12% in comparable B2B forms without sacrificing data quality.