Wire Operations Escalation: Suspicious Activity & Sanctions Screening Alert

1. Section 1: Transaction Identifiers & Beneficiary Metadata

Provide complete transaction details to enable precise identification and traceability. All reference numbers must be accurate for audit trail purposes.

 

Internal Transaction Reference ID

SWIFT MT Message Reference

Transaction Initiation Date/Time (UTC)

Value Date

Transaction Amount (Original Currency)

Original Currency Code

USD Equivalent Amount

Exchange Rate Applied (if applicable)

Ordering Customer Full Legal Name

Ordering Customer Account Number

Ordering Customer Registered Address

Ordering Customer Country of Incorporation/Residence

Ordering Customer BIC/SWIFT Code

Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) Name (if different)

UBO Registered Address

UBO Country of Residence

Beneficiary Full Legal Name

Beneficiary Full Address

Beneficiary Account Number/IBAN

Beneficiary Bank Name

Beneficiary Bank BIC/SWIFT Code

Beneficiary Bank Country

Correspondent/Intermediary Bank Details (if applicable)

Payment Details/Remittance Information

Payment Purpose Category

Is this transaction marked as urgent or same-day?

 

Explain the business justification for urgency:

Does this transaction involve third-party payments (i.e., payer differs from ordering customer)?

 

Provide third-party payer details and relationship to beneficiary:

2. Section 2: Red-Flag Trigger & Sanctions/PEP Matching Details

Document the specific trigger that caused this escalation. Provide precise details from screening systems and manual observations to support the suspicion.

 

Primary Alert Trigger Type (select all that apply)

Name of Screening/Surveillance System

Alert Generation Timestamp

Sanctions/PEP Match Confidence Score (%)

Screening Match Details

Matched Entity Name

List Source

Match Type

Additional Identifiers (DOB, Passport, Address)

True Match?

False Positive Justification

A
B
C
D
E
F
1
 
 
 
 
 
 
2
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
 
 
 
 
 
 
4
 
 
 
 
 
 
5
 
 
 
 
 
 
6
 
 
 
 
 
 
7
 
 
 
 
 
 
8
 
 
 
 
 
 
9
 
 
 
 
 
 
10
 
 
 
 
 
 

Is this a confirmed true positive match against a sanctions list?

 

Specify exact sanctions program and prohibitions applicable:

Does the PEP match involve a domestic or foreign politically exposed person?

 

PEP Category

Transaction Monitoring Red Flags Detected (select all that apply)

Detailed Description of Red Flag Observations

Has the beneficiary or ordering customer appeared in adverse media recently?

 

Summarize adverse media findings including source and date:

Does the transaction involve a high-risk jurisdiction as per internal policy?

 

High-Risk Jurisdiction Category

Overall Risk Rating of This Transaction

Additional Risk Factors Not Covered Above

3. Section 3: Source of Funds & Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) Verification

Document all efforts to verify the legitimacy of funds and conduct Enhanced Due Diligence. This section demonstrates reasonable measures taken before escalation.

 

Declared Source of Funds

Detailed Source of Funds Explanation

Has source of funds documentation been obtained and verified?

 

Documentation Types Obtained

 

Explain why documentation could not be obtained:

Upload Source of Funds Documentation

Choose a file or drop it here
 

Customer Risk Rating at Account Opening

Current Customer Risk Rating

Has the customer's risk rating been escalated due to this transaction?

 

Justification for risk rating escalation:

Date of Last EDD Review

Is the transaction consistent with the customer's stated business profile?

 

Explain the inconsistency:

Have you reviewed the customer's transaction history for the past 12 months?

 

Summarize historical activity patterns and deviations observed:

Customer's Average Monthly Transaction Volume

Number of Transactions in Past 30 Days

Does this transaction represent a significant deviation from normal activity?

 

Quantify the deviation and explain possible legitimate reasons:

Have you attempted to contact the customer for additional information?

 

Summarize customer responses or contact attempts:

 

Explain why customer contact was not attempted or was deferred:

Is there any indication of shell company involvement?

 

Detail the shell company indicators observed:

Have you verified the beneficiary's legitimacy through independent sources?

 

Verification Methods Used

Summary of EDD Measures Conducted

4. Section 4: Law Enforcement/Regulatory Reporting Checklist

Complete this section to assess reporting obligations across all relevant jurisdictions. Failure to report in a timely manner may result in regulatory penalties.

 

Does this transaction potentially violate international sanctions regulations?

 

Specify which sanctions regime and prohibitive conduct:

Is there reasonable suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing?

 

Explain the predicate offense and suspicious indicators:

Is this transaction above the threshold for mandatory reporting in your jurisdiction?

 

Reporting Threshold Amount

Applicable Reporting Obligations (select all that apply)

Jurisdictional Reporting Requirements

Jurisdiction

Relevant Authority

Report Type Required

Reporting Deadline (Hours)

Report Filed?

Date/Time Filed

A
B
C
D
E
F
1
 
 
 
 
 
 
2
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
 
 
 
 
 
 
4
 
 
 
 
 
 
5
 
 
 
 
 
 
6
 
 
 
 
 
 
7
 
 
 
 
 
 
8
 
 
 
 
 
 
9
 
 
 
 
 
 
10
 
 
 
 
 
 

Has a similar transaction been reported previously for this customer or beneficiary?

 

Provide previous report reference numbers and dates:

Have you consulted with internal Legal department regarding reporting obligations?

 

Legal Counsel Name

Has law enforcement previously requested information about this customer or transaction?

 

Detail law enforcement agency, case reference, and nature of request:

Is there an active gag order or confidentiality restriction preventing disclosure?

 

Describe restriction source and scope:

Will this report trigger a tipping-off risk if customer is notified?

 

Explain tipping-off risk mitigation measures:

Summary of Regulatory Analysis and Reporting Decision Rationale

Attach Draft Regulatory Report(s) for CCO Review

Choose a file or drop it here
 

I confirm that all relevant jurisdictions have been considered for reporting obligations

5. Section 5: Chief Compliance Officer Release or Freeze Sign-Off

Chief Compliance Officer to review all preceding sections and make final determination on transaction disposition. This decision is subject to regulatory examination.

 

CCO Reviewer Name

CCO Position Title

CCO Review Date/Time

Recommended Action

Overall Risk Assessment Score (1=Low, 5=Critical)

CCO Risk Assessment Summary and Rationale

Does this require immediate freezing under applicable sanctions laws?

 

I confirm that freezing decision complies with all applicable blocking statutes

Should this be escalated to the Board Risk Committee?

 

Summarize issues requiring board attention:

Are there conditions attached to release decision?

 

Specify release conditions and monitoring requirements:

Is law enforcement liaison required prior to action?

 

Detail liaison plan and contact points:

Follow-Up Actions Required and Timeline

Chief Compliance Officer Digital Signature

I have independently verified all information in Sections 1-4 and accept full compliance responsibility for this decision

I confirm that the decision is consistent with the institution's AML/CFT and sanctions policies

I acknowledge that this decision may be subject to regulatory review and examination

To configure an element, select it on the form.

To add a new question or element, click the Question & Element button in the vertical toolbar on the left.