This form is used to request the landlord's or property manager's prior written approval for a proposed sublet, assignment, licence to occupy, or any alteration, addition or fit-out works to the leased premises. Please answer every question fully and accurately. Incomplete submissions may be returned and will delay the review process. Where a question does not apply, write "Not applicable" rather than leaving it blank.
All supporting documents (drawings, specifications, insurance certificates, licences and contractor details) should be uploaded at the end of the relevant section. Fields marked as mandatory must be completed before the request can be submitted.
Date of this request
Internal reference or project code (if any)
What type of approval are you requesting?
Sublet of part of the premises
Sublet of the entire premises
Assignment of the whole lease
Licence to occupy a defined area
Alterations or fit-out works only
Both a sublet/assignment and alterations
Not sure - please advise
Please describe which part of the premises you intend to sublet and how it will be demised or separated.
Will you retain any presence or staff at the premises after subletting the entire area?
Please describe what presence you will retain and how it will operate alongside the sub-tenant.
Will you remain liable under the lease after the assignment?
Please describe the proposed liability arrangement, guarantees or undertakings.
Please describe the licensed area, its boundaries and the intended duration of the licence.
Please provide a short summary of the proposed works.
Please explain how the sublet and the proposed works relate to one another (for example, works required to separate the sublet area).
Please describe what you are proposing so that the landlord can advise on the correct approval route.
Is this request related to, or a variation of, a request previously submitted to the landlord?
Please provide the previous request reference and date
Thank you. Please continue to the next section.
Do you require the approval by a specific deadline (for example, to meet a contract, financing or construction milestone)?
Please state the deadline and the reason it applies.
Please provide the legal details of the tenant named in the lease. The applicant must be the tenant (or an authorised representative acting on the tenant's behalf).
Registered legal name of the tenant
Trading name or brand operating at the premises
Legal form of the tenant entity
Individual/sole trader
Partnership
Private limited company
Public listed company
Non-profit/charity/association
Government or public body
Trust
Other:
Company/entity registration number
Registered address of the tenant entity
Primary contact person for this request
Job title or position of the contact person
Email address of the contact person
Telephone number (including country and area code)
Is this request being submitted by an agent, lawyer or other representative acting for the tenant?
Please provide the representative's name, firm, contact details and confirm the authority under which they act.
How many years has the tenant been in occupation of the premises?
Has the tenant ever been in breach of the lease, received a formal notice, or been in dispute with the landlord?
Please describe the circumstances, the dates involved and how the matter was resolved.
Please confirm the details of the lease and the premises exactly as they appear in the lease document. If the premises form part of a larger building, please also identify the building and estate.
Building or estate name
Full address of the premises
Street Address
Suite, unit or floor identifier
City
State/Province
Postal/Zip Code
Country
Total leased area of the premises
Unit of measurement for the leased area
Square metres
Square feet
Square yards
Hectares
Acres
Lease reference/lease number
Lease commencement date
Lease expiry date
Next rent review or escalation date (if any)
Permitted use stated in the lease
Current annual base rent payable for the whole premises
Current annual service charge/common area costs payable
Does the lease contain options to renew, extend or break?
Please summarise the renewal, extension or break provisions and the notice periods involved.
Is the premises subject to any mortgage, charge or other encumbrance that the landlord has notified you of?
Please provide details of the encumbrance and any consent requirements notified to you.
Complete this section if your request involves a sublet, assignment or licence to occupy. If your request relates only to alterations, please write "Not applicable" and continue to the alteration section.
Please describe the proposed transaction in your own words, including the commercial rationale.
Which part of the premises is affected?
The entire premises
A defined part of the premises
Shared use of the whole premises
Storage, ancillary or back-of-house areas only
Please describe the exact boundaries of the affected area and how it will be physically separated or identified.
Please describe how shared use will work in practice, including access, hours and shared facilities.
Area to be sublet, assigned or licensed
Percentage of the total leased area affected
Proposed start date of the sublet, assignment or licence
Proposed end date of the sublet, assignment or licence
Will the proposed arrangement extend beyond the expiry date of the head lease?
Please explain how this will be dealt with and what protections are proposed for the sub-tenant and the landlord.
Nature of the proposed arrangement
Sublease at market rent
Sublease at a rent below market
Sublease at a rent above market
Assignment of the lease
Licence to occupy
Sharing of occupation with an affiliate or group company
Other arrangement
Please explain why the rent is below market and how any shortfall will be covered.
Please explain the basis of the rent and provide evidence of the market comparison used.
Please describe the relationship between the parties and the terms of the occupation sharing arrangement.
Please describe the arrangement in full.
Will the current tenant retain any right to re-enter or occupy the sublet area during the term?
Please describe the retained rights and the notice arrangements.
Does the proposed sub-tenant or assignee have any existing relationship with the tenant (for example, a group company, shareholder or affiliate)?
Please describe the relationship and disclose any common ownership or control.
What documents have been prepared in connection with the proposed arrangement?
Draft sublease or licence agreement
Assignment agreement
Business plan or use statement
Financial statements of the incoming party
References or trade references
Market rent evidence or valuation
Legal opinion or advice
None of the above yet
The landlord will assess the covenant strength, reputation and suitability of the proposed incoming occupier. Please provide complete and verifiable information.
Legal name of the proposed sub-tenant or assignee
Trading name of the proposed sub-tenant or assignee
Legal form of the incoming occupier
Individual/sole trader
Partnership
Private limited company
Public listed company
Non-profit/charity/association
Government or public body
Trust
Other:
Registration or incorporation number of the incoming occupier
Registered address of the incoming occupier
Nature of the incoming occupier's business
Number of years the incoming occupier has been trading
Number of employees expected to work at the premises
Authorised signatory of the incoming occupier (Name & Title)
Contact email of the incoming occupier
Contact telephone of the incoming occupier
Can the incoming occupier provide audited or independently prepared financial statements for the last two financial years?
Please upload the most recent financial statements
Please explain why financial statements are not available and what alternative evidence of financial standing can be provided.
Has the incoming occupier ever been insolvent, entered administration, receivership, liquidation or any equivalent process?
Please provide full details including dates, the process involved and the outcome.
Is the incoming occupier subject to any current or pending litigation, regulatory investigation or enforcement action relevant to its business?
Please summarise the matters, their status and the potential impact on the occupation of the premises.
Will the incoming occupier require any special licence, permit or regulatory approval to operate from the premises (for example, food service, healthcare, financial services, childcare)?
Which categories of licence or approval are required?
Food, beverage or hospitality
Healthcare, medical or dental
Childcare or education
Financial, insurance or legal services
Pharmaceutical or controlled substances
Alcohol or gaming
Manufacturing or light industrial
Other:
Trade and professional references for the incoming occupier
Reference type | Organisation name | Contact person | Email address | Years of relationship | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | ||
1 | Landlord reference | Riverside Property Group | Priya Nair | p.nair@example.com | 4 | |
2 | Bank reference | Continental Commercial Bank | Marcus Feld | m.feld@example.com | 6 | |
3 | Trade supplier | Vertex Office Supplies | Sofia Almeida | s.almeida@example.com | 3 | |
4 | ||||||
5 | ||||||
6 | ||||||
7 | ||||||
8 | ||||||
9 | ||||||
10 |
The landlord needs to understand how the premises will actually be used and operated on a day-to-day basis, in order to assess the impact on the building, its services and the other occupants.
Please describe the proposed use of the premises in detail, including the activities carried on, the goods or services provided and any customer or visitor interaction.
Does the proposed use fall within the permitted use stated in the lease?
Yes, entirely within the permitted use
Yes, but only with a variation or clarification
No, a change of use will be required
Unsure - please advise
Please explain the variation or clarification sought and why it is consistent with the spirit of the lease.
Please describe the proposed change of use and any planning, licensing or regulatory consents you believe are required.
Please describe the proposed use so that the landlord can assess whether it falls within the permitted use.
Proposed operating hours (weekdays)
Proposed operating hours (weekends and public holidays)
Will the premises be occupied outside of normal building operating hours?
Please state the extended hours required, the number of staff involved and any additional security, cleaning or air-conditioning services needed.
Maximum number of people expected on site at any one time (staff plus visitors)
Estimated number of daily visitors or customers
Will the operation generate significant noise, vibration, odour, dust or fumes?
Which impacts do you anticipate?
Noise
Vibration
Odour
Dust
Fumes or exhaust
Light spillage
None of these
Please describe the source of the noise and the mitigation measures proposed.
Please describe the source of the odour and the ventilation or extraction measures proposed.
Please describe the fume sources, extraction route and any discharge point.
Will any hazardous, flammable, controlled or environmentally sensitive materials be stored or used on the premises?
Please list each substance, its classification, the quantities stored, the storage method and the safety data sheets available.
Will the premises be used for any manufacturing, assembly, commercial kitchen or process requiring enhanced utilities?
Please describe the process, the equipment involved and the additional power, water, drainage or ventilation capacity required.
Which building services and facilities will the operation rely on?
Standard heating and air-conditioning
Extended or 24-hour air-conditioning
Enhanced electrical supply or three-phase power
Specialist drainage or grease management
Enhanced data and telecommunications capacity
Freight lift or loading dock access
Water supply to the premises
None beyond standard provision
Number of car parking spaces requested
Number of bicycle parking spaces requested
Will signage, branding or external identification be displayed?
Please describe the type, size, location and illumination of each sign, and upload any design drawings in the documents section.
Will the operation involve deliveries of goods, equipment or waste outside standard building hours?
Please describe the delivery schedule, vehicle types and the proposed loading arrangements.
Complete this section if any works are proposed, whether carried out by the tenant, a sub-tenant or a contractor. Alterations include any addition to, or change of, the premises, its fixtures, fittings, services or structure.
Please provide a full description of the proposed works, including the existing condition and the intended finished condition.
Which categories of work are included in the proposal?
Decorative finishes only (paint, carpet, ceiling tiles)
Non-structural partitions, doors and glazing
Structural alterations or openings in walls or slabs
Mechanical, electrical or plumbing alterations
Fire, life-safety or sprinkler system alterations
Façade, window or external alterations
Roof, terrace or external area works
Accessibility improvements
IT, security, access control or audio-visual systems
Other specialist works
Please describe the structural elements affected and confirm whether a structural engineer has been appointed.
Please describe the fire and life-safety systems affected, including any impact on detection, suppression, compartmentation or evacuation routes.
Please describe the external alterations and any impact on the appearance, weather-tightness or energy performance of the building.
Please describe the specialist works and the qualifications of the specialists proposed.
Total floor area affected by the works
Will the works be temporary or permanent?
Permanent and intended to remain at lease expiry
Permanent but to be removed at lease expiry
Temporary for the duration of the sublet or project
Partly temporary and partly permanent
Will you reinstate the premises to their original condition at the end of the lease?
Please describe the reinstatement scope and whether a reinstatement bond or deposit is proposed.
Please explain why reinstatement is not proposed and what alternative arrangement is offered to the landlord.
Will the works affect the structure, foundations, roof, façade or load-bearing elements of the building?
Please describe the structural impact and provide details of the structural engineer's assessment and calculations.
Will the works affect the building's mechanical, electrical, plumbing, drainage, fire or life-safety systems?
Please describe each system affected, the proposed modifications and how system integrity and performance will be maintained.
Will any works be carried out in common areas, risers, roof space, plant rooms or areas outside the demised premises?
Please identify each common or shared area affected and describe the works proposed there.
Will the works require any permit, licence, consent or notification to a public authority?
Which consents do you expect to require?
Planning or development consent
Building or construction permit
Fire safety approval
Environmental or waste permit
Health and safety notification
Heritage or listed structure consent
Road, footpath or public realm permit
Other:
Who will carry out the works?
An appointed main contractor
Multiple specialist contractors appointed directly
Tenant's own in-house facilities team
The landlord or landlord's contractor
Not yet appointed
Please provide the main contractor's name and contact details
Please describe the works you would like the landlord to undertake and confirm your acceptance of the landlord's charges.
Please confirm the expected appointment date and the procurement method to be used.
Has a competitive tender or quotation process been undertaken for the works?
How many quotations were obtained?
I confirm that the works will be carried out in a good and workmanlike manner, using materials of good quality, and in accordance with all applicable standards, codes and the building's rules and regulations.
Please outline the proposed construction programme and the measures that will be taken to minimise disruption to the building, its services and the other occupants.
Proposed works commencement date
Proposed works completion date
Estimated total duration of the works (calendar days)
During which hours will the works be carried out?
Standard building working hours only
Extended weekday hours
Evenings and nights
Weekends and public holidays
A combination of the above
Please explain why out-of-hours working is necessary and how noise and disturbance will be controlled.
Please explain why weekend working is necessary and confirm your acceptance of any additional building service charges.
Please set out the proposed working pattern for each period and the associated controls.
Will the works require noisy operations such as drilling, cutting, breaking out or demolition?
Please list the noisy operations, their duration and the measures proposed to limit disturbance (for example, acoustic screening, restricted hours, advance notice).
Will any part of the building's services need to be shut down temporarily (power, water, lifts, air-conditioning, fire systems)?
Please identify each service, the proposed shutdown dates and times, the duration and the contingency arrangements for other occupants.
How will materials, equipment and waste be moved in and out of the building?
Passenger lift with protection
Freight or service lift
External scaffold or hoist
Loading dock or service yard
Stairwell with protection
Out-of-hours movement only
No significant deliveries required
Please describe the housekeeping, dust control, waste removal and site security arrangements during the works.
Will the premises remain occupied and operational while the works are carried out?
Please describe how operations will continue safely alongside the works, including any temporary partitions, access routes or life-safety arrangements.
Please rank the following project priorities in order of importance to you (1 = most important).
Cost certainty | |
Speed of delivery | |
Minimal disruption to neighbours | |
Sustainability and environmental performance | |
Design quality and brand alignment | |
Flexibility for future change |
Please set out the financial terms of the proposed arrangement and the costs of any works. The landlord may levy reasonable fees for the review of the request and for professional or supervisory services.
Estimated cost of proposed works
Work item | Category | Estimated cost | Duration (days) | Average cost per day | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | ||
1 | Demolition of existing partitions | Non-structural | $4,200.00 | 3 | $1,400.00 | |
2 | New glazed meeting rooms and doors | Non-structural | $26,500.00 | 12 | $2,208.33 | |
3 | Mechanical and electrical alterations | Building services | $38,750.00 | 15 | $2,583.33 | |
4 | Floor finishes and decoration | Decorative | $12,300.00 | 6 | $2,050.00 | |
5 | Fire detection and sprinkler modifications | Life safety | $19,600.00 | 8 | $2,450.00 | |
6 | $0.00 | |||||
7 | $0.00 | |||||
8 | $0.00 | |||||
9 | $0.00 | |||||
10 | $0.00 |
Total estimated cost of the works
Proposed rent payable by the sub-tenant for the sublet area (per year)
Percentage of any sublet profit to be shared with the landlord (if applicable)
Will the tenant continue to pay the full rent and outgoings to the landlord regardless of the sublet arrangement?
I confirm that the tenant remains primarily liable for all rent, service charges, outgoings and obligations under the lease.
Please explain the proposed payment structure and how the landlord's income will be protected.
Who will bear the cost of the landlord's reasonable legal, professional and supervisory fees?
The tenant, in full
The tenant and the incoming occupier, shared equally
The incoming occupier, in full
To be negotiated
Is a rent deposit, bank guarantee or other security proposed for the incoming occupier?
Please describe the form and amount of the security, the provider and the proposed release conditions.
Is a reinstatement bond or make-good deposit proposed for the works?
Please state the amount of the reinstatement bond or deposit
Any additional amount the tenant is prepared to contribute towards landlord's works or upgrades
Please provide any other financial information relevant to this request, including funding arrangements or budget approvals.
Please list all consultants, designers and contractors engaged in connection with the request or the works. Each party must hold appropriate qualifications, licences and insurance.
Professional team and contractors
Role | Firm or individual name | Contact person and email | Licence or registration no. | Insurance expiry date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | ||
1 | ||||||
2 | ||||||
3 | ||||||
4 | ||||||
5 | ||||||
6 | ||||||
7 | ||||||
8 | ||||||
9 | ||||||
10 |
Has the main contractor provided evidence of health and safety competence and a satisfactory safety record?
Please upload the contractor's health and safety policy and accident record
Please explain what evidence is outstanding and when it will be provided.
Will any party involved in the works be a related party to the tenant or the incoming occupier?
Please identify the related party and describe the relationship and the basis of their appointment.
All insurance requirements set out in the lease must continue to be met throughout the term of the sublet and the duration of any works. Please confirm the arrangements below and upload current certificates.
Insurance arrangements
Policy type | Insurer or broker | Policy number | Coverage limit | Policy expiry date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | ||
1 | Public and general liability | Meridian Insurance Partners | PL-9930-2251 | $5,000,000.00 | 4/30/2027 | |
2 | Property and contents | Meridian Insurance Partners | PC-8812-4410 | $1,250,000.00 | 4/30/2027 | |
3 | Contractor's all risks | Sentinel Risk Cover | CAR-5521-7788 | $3,000,000.00 | 2/28/2027 | |
4 | Workers compensation/employer liability | Sentinel Risk Cover | EL-3390-1102 | $1,000,000.00 | 2/28/2027 | |
5 |
The tenant will maintain all insurance required by the lease throughout the term and will note the landlord's interest where required.
The incoming occupier will maintain insurance on terms no less favourable than those required of the tenant under the lease.
All contractors will maintain contractor's all risks, public liability and employer's liability insurance for the duration of the works, and will provide certificates before commencing on site.
The tenant and the incoming occupier will indemnify the landlord against all claims, losses, damages and costs arising from the sublet, the occupation or the works.
Have any insurers imposed special conditions, exclusions or premium increases in connection with the proposed arrangement?
Please provide details of the conditions, exclusions or increases and how they will be addressed.
Has a risk assessment been prepared for the proposed works?
Please upload the risk assessment and method statement
Please confirm when the risk assessment and method statement will be submitted to the landlord.
Will the works involve any activity requiring a permit to work (hot works, working at height, confined spaces, electrical isolation)?
Which permit-to-work activities are anticipated?
Hot works (welding, cutting, grinding)
Working at height
Confined space entry
Electrical isolation or energised work
Excavation or breaking out
Work on fire or sprinkler systems
None of these
Please confirm compliance with the lease, the building rules and all laws, codes and standards applicable to the premises and the proposed use or works. This form does not constitute legal advice and does not replace any consent required under the lease or applicable law.
The proposed sublet, assignment or licence complies with all applicable laws, regulations and codes governing the premises and the proposed use.
The proposed works comply with all applicable building, planning, fire, accessibility, environmental and health and safety requirements.
The proposed use is consistent with the permitted use in the lease and with any rules governing the building or estate.
All information provided in this form is true, complete and not misleading, and I will notify the landlord of any material change before the arrangement is completed.
Are you aware of any restriction, covenant, easement, planning condition or building rule that could prevent or limit the proposed arrangement or works?
Please describe the restriction and how you propose to deal with it.
Does the proposed use or works involve any personal data processing, surveillance, or security systems that may be subject to data protection requirements?
Please describe the systems, the data processed and the safeguards and notices that will be in place.
Will the arrangement involve any party subject to trade sanctions, export controls or similar restrictions that the landlord should be aware of?
Please provide full details so that appropriate checks can be carried out.
Has legal advice been obtained in connection with this request?
Please provide the name of the adviser and a summary of the advice received (without disclosing privileged detail if preferred).
Do you require the landlord to enter into any direct agreement, deed of consent, guarantee or non-disturbance arrangement?
Please describe the document required and the proposed terms.
The landlord is interested in the wider impact of the proposal on the building, its occupants and its environmental performance. Please answer the following so that any positive or negative effects can be assessed.
Please rate the anticipated impact of your proposal on the following aspects of the building.
No impact | Minor impact | Moderate impact | Significant impact | Severe impact | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Building services capacity and energy consumption | |||||
Common areas, circulation and lift usage | |||||
Other tenants, neighbours and the local community | |||||
Car parking, transport and traffic | |||||
Security, access control and life safety | |||||
Waste management, recycling and loading areas | |||||
Noise, air quality and general amenity |
Which sustainability measures are included in the proposal?
Reuse or recycling of existing fit-out materials
Energy-efficient lighting and controls
High-efficiency heating, ventilation and cooling
Low-flow water fixtures
Sustainable or certified materials
Waste segregation and recycling during works
Measurement and reduction of operational carbon
None specifically planned
Will the proposal improve accessibility for people with disabilities or reduced mobility?
Please describe the accessibility improvements proposed.
Will the proposal reduce the building's environmental performance or increase its carbon emissions?
Please describe the expected impact and the mitigation measures proposed.
On a scale of 1 to 5, how confident are you that the proposal can be delivered within the stated programme and budget?
Please upload all relevant supporting material. Drawings should be legible, dated and clearly referenced. Where a document is not yet available, please state when it will be provided.
Please indicate which documents are attached to this submission.
Existing condition plans and drawings
Proposed layout plans and drawings
Reflected ceiling and lighting plans
Mechanical, electrical and plumbing drawings
Fire, life-safety and sprinkler drawings
Structural calculations and engineer's report
Specification of finishes and materials
Signage design and location drawings
Photographs of the existing premises
Draft sublease, assignment or licence agreement
Financial statements of the incoming occupier
Insurance certificates
Contractor's method statement and risk assessment
Programme or schedule of works
Please upload the proposed layout drawings
Please upload the specification of works and finishes
Please upload the draft sublease, assignment or licence agreement
Please upload insurance certificates and contractor documentation
Please upload photographs of the existing premises and any relevant conditions
Drawing and document register
Document or drawing number | Title | Revision | Issue date | Attached | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | ||
1 | A-100 | Existing condition plan | P01 | 2/10/2026 | ||
2 | A-200 | Proposed layout plan | P02 | 2/18/2026 | ||
3 | M-300 | Mechanical layout and ventilation | P01 | 2/18/2026 | ||
4 | E-400 | Lighting and power layout | P01 | 2/18/2026 | ||
5 | ||||||
6 | ||||||
7 | ||||||
8 | ||||||
9 | ||||||
10 |
Please read each undertaking carefully. By signing below, the applicant confirms that the information provided is accurate and accepts the obligations described. Submission of this form does not constitute approval; the landlord's written consent is required before any sublet, assignment, occupation or works may proceed.
I confirm that I am authorised to submit this request on behalf of the tenant and that all information provided is true and complete.
I understand that the landlord's approval, if granted, may be subject to conditions, and that I will comply with those conditions in full.
I confirm that no sublet, assignment, occupation or works will commence before the landlord's written approval has been received.
I agree to provide any further information, drawings, certificates or evidence that the landlord may reasonably require in order to consider this request.
I acknowledge that the landlord may charge reasonable fees for the review of this request and for any professional or supervisory services required.
Any additional notes, declarations or matters you wish to bring to the landlord's attention
Full name of the authorised signatory
Position or title of the authorised signatory
Date of signature
Please sign in the box below to confirm the declarations above
This section is to be completed by the landlord, property manager or their authorised representative. Applicants should leave this section blank.
Received by
Date received
Request reference number assigned
Decision
Approved without conditions
Approved subject to conditions
Deferred - further information required
Refused
Please set out the conditions of approval in full.
Please list the further information or documents required before the request can be determined.
Please state the reasons for refusal and any alternative that may be considered.
Overall quality and completeness of the submission
Landlord's fees, costs and professional charges assessed
Target date for issuing the formal response
Internal notes, conditions and follow-up actions
Analysis for Commercial Lease Sublet & Alteration Approval Request Form
Important Note: This analysis provides strategic insights to help you get the most from your form's submission data for powerful follow-up actions and better outcomes. Please remove this content before publishing the form to the public.
The Commercial Lease Sublet & Alteration Approval Request Form is an exceptionally comprehensive and well-structured document designed to facilitate the landlord or property manager's review of sublet, assignment, licence, or alteration requests. The form demonstrates a deep understanding of commercial lease law and property management, covering every critical dimension of such requests—from tenant identity and lease terms through to sub-tenant due diligence, proposed use, construction works, financial arrangements, insurance, legal compliance, and sustainability. Its modular, section-based structure guides the applicant logically through the process, while conditional follow-up questions ensure that only relevant information is collected based on the nature of the request. The inclusion of a dedicated landlord-use section at the end further enhances its utility as a complete workflow tool.
From a data collection perspective, the form is designed to produce high-quality, verifiable information that enables thorough due diligence. The use of structured input types—such as tables for cost breakdowns, professional teams, and insurance; checkboxes for declarations; file uploads for supporting documents; and conditional logic for follow-ups—minimizes ambiguity and ensures consistency. The form also addresses critical risk areas including financial standing, insolvency history, litigation exposure, regulatory compliance, and environmental impact. While the form is extensive and may present a significant time commitment for applicants, its thoroughness is justified by the legal and financial complexity of commercial lease subletting and alterations. The clear instructions, placeholder examples, and section-level guidance help mitigate user friction and improve completion rates.
The question Date of this request serves as a fundamental administrative anchor for the entire approval process. In the context of a commercial lease sublet or alteration request, establishing the submission date is critical because it determines the timeline for the landlord's review, sets the baseline for any statutory or contractual response periods, and provides a reference point for tracking the request through to resolution. Without a clear submission date, there is no way to establish when the clock started for the landlord's obligation to respond, nor can the parties accurately assess whether any deadlines or milestones have been met.
From a design perspective, making this field mandatory is a sound decision. The date of submission is the single most important piece of metadata for any formal request, and its absence would create significant administrative confusion. The use of a date input type ensures that the data is captured in a consistent, machine-readable format, reducing the risk of ambiguity that could arise from free-text date entries. This is particularly important in a commercial context where precise dating can have legal implications.
In terms of data collection implications, this question produces a simple but essential data point. It will be used for record-keeping, correspondence, and potentially in any legal proceedings related to the lease. The privacy implications are minimal, as the submission date is not personally sensitive information. However, it does establish a formal record that could be referenced in disputes.
From a user experience standpoint, this is an easy and intuitive question to answer. Placing it at the very beginning of the form sets the tone for a structured, professional process. The mandatory status is appropriate and unlikely to cause friction, as users will naturally know when they are submitting the form.
The question What type of approval are you requesting? is the pivotal branching question of the entire form. Its purpose is to categorize the nature of the request—whether it involves a sublet of part or all of the premises, an assignment of the lease, a licence to occupy, alterations or fit-out works, or a combination thereof. This categorization is essential because each type of request triggers different legal requirements, review processes, and documentation needs. A sublet, for example, raises questions about the sub-tenant's covenant strength and the division of the premises, while an alteration request focuses on construction impacts, building systems, and compliance with building codes.
The design of this question is particularly effective. By offering seven clear options—including a 'Not sure' option—the form accommodates the full spectrum of requests while acknowledging that some applicants may need guidance on the correct approval route. The conditional follow-up questions for each option are a standout feature: they ensure that the applicant provides the specific details relevant to their chosen request type without being overwhelmed by irrelevant questions. For instance, selecting 'Sublet of part of the premises' triggers a question about how the area will be demised or separated, while selecting 'Alterations or fit-out works only' triggers a question about the scope of works.
The data collected through this question and its follow-ups is foundational to the entire review process. It determines which subsequent sections of the form are most relevant and helps the landlord prioritize their assessment. The quality of data here is high, as the structured options minimize free-text ambiguity, while the follow-up questions capture the nuance that the options alone cannot convey.
From a user experience perspective, this question is well-placed at the beginning of the form. It immediately engages the applicant in a decision that shapes their entire experience, making the form feel responsive and tailored rather than generic. The conditional logic reduces cognitive load by hiding irrelevant follow-ups. The mandatory status is absolutely essential—without knowing the type of request, the landlord cannot begin their review.
The question Is this request related to, or a variation of, a request previously submitted to the landlord? serves the critical purpose of establishing continuity and context in the approval process. In commercial lease management, it is common for requests to evolve over time—initial proposals may be refined, expanded, or modified based on feedback, changing circumstances, or new information. By asking whether this request relates to a previous submission, the form ensures that the landlord can link the current request to any prior correspondence, decisions, or conditions, avoiding duplication of effort and ensuring consistency in the review process.
The design of this question is effective in its simplicity. The yes/no format is clear and easy to answer, and the conditional follow-up for a 'Yes' response asks for the previous request reference and date, which are the exact data points needed to retrieve the prior submission. The 'No' follow-up is a helpful touch, providing a brief confirmation message that reassures the applicant they are on the right track. This small detail enhances the user experience without adding unnecessary complexity.
In terms of data collection, this question produces a binary flag and, when applicable, a reference number and date. This information is invaluable for record-keeping and workflow management. It allows the landlord's team to quickly retrieve related documents and understand the evolution of the request. The privacy implications are minimal, as the reference numbers are internal identifiers rather than personal data.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is well-timed and appropriately mandatory. Applicants who have previously submitted a request will appreciate the opportunity to link their submissions, while those who have not will find the question straightforward. The mandatory status ensures that the landlord has complete information about the request's history.
The question Do you require the approval by a specific deadline? is designed to identify any time-sensitive elements of the request. In commercial lease management, sublet and alteration requests often have external drivers—such as contractual obligations, financing deadlines, construction schedules, or regulatory requirements—that necessitate a timely response. By capturing this information upfront, the landlord can prioritize their review and manage expectations around the response timeline.
The design of this question is well-conceived. The yes/no format keeps it simple, while the conditional follow-up for a 'Yes' response asks for both the deadline and the reason it applies. This dual request is important: the deadline itself is useful for scheduling, but the reason provides context that helps the landlord assess the urgency and legitimacy of the request. A deadline driven by a contractual obligation, for example, may carry more weight than one driven by a preference.
The data collected through this question is operationally valuable. It feeds into the landlord's workflow management and helps ensure that time-sensitive requests are not lost in the queue. The privacy implications are minimal, though the reason for the deadline may reveal some commercial information about the tenant's business activities.
From a user experience perspective, this question demonstrates that the form is designed with the applicant's needs in mind. Many applicants will have deadlines, and the opportunity to flag them is a positive feature. The mandatory status of the follow-up when a deadline is indicated ensures that the landlord has sufficient information to act on it.
The question Registered legal name of the tenant is a foundational data point for the entire approval process. In commercial lease law, the tenant is the legal entity bound by the lease, and any sublet, assignment, or alteration request must be made by or on behalf of that entity. The registered legal name is the identifier used in the lease document, corporate registries, and all legal correspondence. Without this information, the landlord cannot verify that the request is being made by the correct party, nor can they cross-reference the request with their lease records.
The design of this question is straightforward and effective. The single-line text input with a placeholder example guides the applicant to provide the full legal name rather than a trading name or abbreviation. This is important because the legal name may differ significantly from the trading name, and using the wrong name could create legal complications. The mandatory status is essential—this is one of the most critical pieces of information in the form.
In terms of data collection, this question produces a precise, verifiable data point. The landlord can cross-reference the name against their lease database and corporate registries to confirm the tenant's identity and legal status. The privacy implications are minimal for business entities but may be more sensitive for sole traders or individuals.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is clear and easy to answer. The placeholder example is helpful, and the mandatory status is appropriate. The question is placed early in the form, which is logical—establishing the applicant's identity is the first step in any formal request process.
The question Legal form of the tenant entity provides essential context about the tenant's corporate structure and legal standing. The legal form—whether the tenant is an individual, partnership, limited company, public company, non-profit, government body, trust, or other entity—has significant implications for the landlord's assessment. Different legal forms carry different levels of liability, regulatory requirements, and covenant strength. A public listed company, for example, may be viewed more favorably than a sole trader in terms of financial stability and ability to meet lease obligations.
The design of this question is well-executed. The single-choice format with eight options covers the full spectrum of legal forms commonly encountered in commercial leases. The inclusion of an 'Other' option with a mandatory follow-up to specify the legal form ensures that unusual entity types are captured accurately. This is important because the legal form can affect the landlord's consent process—for example, a trust may require additional documentation to verify the trustees' authority.
The data collected through this question is highly structured and verifiable. It enables the landlord to categorize the tenant and apply appropriate due diligence standards. The privacy implications are minimal for business entities but may be more sensitive for individuals.
From a user experience standpoint, the single-choice format is efficient and easy to use. The mandatory status is appropriate, as the legal form is a fundamental piece of information for the landlord's review.
The question Primary contact person for this request identifies the individual who will serve as the main point of communication between the landlord and the tenant throughout the approval process. In a commercial lease context, having a designated contact person is essential for efficient communication, clarification of details, and coordination of any follow-up actions. Without a clear contact person, the landlord may struggle to reach the tenant promptly, leading to delays and potential misunderstandings.
The design of this question is simple and effective. The single-line text input with a placeholder example guides the applicant to provide a full name. Making this field mandatory ensures that the landlord always has a point of contact, which is critical for the smooth processing of the request. The related fields for job title, email, and telephone number further enhance the contact information captured.
In terms of data collection, this question produces personal information about the contact person. The landlord will use this information for communication purposes, and it should be handled in accordance with applicable data protection regulations. The quality of data is high, as the single-line text format with examples encourages accurate and complete entries.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is straightforward and unlikely to cause friction. Most applicants will readily know who their primary contact is. The mandatory status is appropriate and ensures that the landlord has the information needed to proceed with the review.
The question Has the tenant ever been in breach of the lease, received a formal notice, or been in dispute with the landlord? is one of the most important due diligence questions in the form. In commercial lease management, the tenant's compliance history is a critical factor in the landlord's decision-making process. A history of breaches, formal notices, or disputes raises red flags about the tenant's reliability and may influence the landlord's willingness to consent to a sublet or alteration. Conversely, a clean compliance record strengthens the tenant's case for approval.
The design of this question is effective. The yes/no format is clear and easy to answer, while the conditional follow-up for a 'Yes' response asks for detailed information about the circumstances, dates, and resolution. This follow-up is essential because it provides context that a simple yes/no answer cannot convey. A minor, resolved breach is very different from an ongoing, unresolved dispute, and the landlord needs this nuance to make an informed decision.
The data collected through this question is sensitive and potentially legally significant. The tenant's compliance history may be used in the landlord's assessment and could be referenced in any subsequent legal proceedings. The privacy implications are notable, as this information relates to the tenant's contractual performance and may be considered confidential.
From a user experience standpoint, this question may cause some anxiety for tenants with a history of issues. However, the mandatory status is essential for the landlord's due diligence. The follow-up question is designed to be constructive rather than punitive, asking for the resolution of the matter as well as the circumstances.
The questions Building or estate name and Full address of the premises identify the physical location context for the leased premises. In commercial lease management, the building and address are key identifiers used for record-keeping, workflow routing, and cross-referencing with the landlord's property database. Different buildings may have different rules, service levels, and management structures, and the landlord needs to know which property the request relates to in order to engage the appropriate building management team.
The design of these questions is straightforward and effective. The single-line text inputs with placeholder examples guide the applicant to provide complete location information. Making these fields mandatory ensures that the landlord can always identify the property in question. The related fields for suite/unit identifier and map location further enhance the location profile.
In terms of data collection, these questions produce simple but essential data points. They are used for record-keeping, workflow routing, and cross-referencing. The privacy implications are minimal, as the address of a commercial premises is generally public information.
From a user experience standpoint, these questions are easy to answer and unlikely to cause friction. The mandatory status is appropriate, as the landlord needs to know which property the request relates to.
The question Lease reference/lease number provides the unique identifier for the lease document. In commercial lease management, the lease reference is the primary key used to retrieve the lease file, cross-reference with the landlord's records, and ensure that the request is processed for the correct lease. Without this reference, the landlord may struggle to locate the relevant lease document, leading to delays and potential errors.
The design of this question is effective. The single-line text input with a placeholder example guides the applicant to provide the exact reference number. Making this field mandatory is essential, as the lease reference is the most efficient way to identify the lease in the landlord's system. The related fields for commencement and expiry dates further enhance the lease information captured.
The data collected through this question is a precise, verifiable identifier. It enables efficient retrieval and cross-referencing of the lease document. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is easy to answer for tenants who have their lease document to hand. The mandatory status is appropriate and ensures that the landlord can process the request efficiently.
The questions Lease commencement date and Lease expiry date define the temporal boundaries of the lease. These dates are critical for assessing the feasibility of any sublet, assignment, or alteration request. A sublet that extends beyond the lease expiry date, for example, raises significant legal issues. Similarly, alteration works that are scheduled to continue beyond the lease expiry may require special arrangements for reinstatement. The commencement date also helps verify the tenant's length of occupation and the remaining term of the lease.
The design of these questions is appropriate. The date input type ensures consistent, machine-readable data. Making both fields mandatory is essential, as the lease term is a fundamental factor in the landlord's assessment. The related fields for next rent review date and permitted use further enhance the lease profile.
The data collected through these questions is precise and verifiable. It can be cross-referenced with the lease document and is used for legal and operational purposes. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, these questions are straightforward. The date input format is intuitive, and the mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Permitted use stated in the lease captures the specific use to which the premises may be put under the lease. This is one of the most important clauses in any commercial lease, as it defines the boundaries of the tenant's occupation. Any proposed sublet, assignment, or change of use must be assessed against the permitted use to determine whether it falls within the lease's terms. A sub-tenant whose business activities fall outside the permitted use may require a variation of the lease, which is a more complex and time-consuming process.
The design of this question is effective. The single-line text input with a placeholder example guides the applicant to provide the exact wording of the permitted use clause. Making this field mandatory is essential, as the permitted use is a fundamental factor in the landlord's assessment. The related question about whether the proposed use falls within the permitted use creates a logical connection between the lease terms and the proposed activity.
The data collected through this question is precise and legally significant. It defines the boundaries of the tenant's occupation and is used to assess the compatibility of the proposed use. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question requires the applicant to refer to their lease document, which may be a minor friction point. However, the placeholder example is helpful, and the mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Current annual base rent payable for the whole premises provides the financial baseline for the landlord's assessment. In commercial lease management, the rent is a key indicator of the premises' value and the tenant's financial commitment. When assessing a sublet request, the landlord needs to know the current rent to evaluate whether the proposed sub-tenant's rent is reasonable and whether the tenant will continue to meet their obligations. For alteration requests, the rent provides context for the scale and value of the premises.
The design of this question is appropriate. The currency input type ensures that the data is captured in a consistent format. Making this field mandatory is essential, as the rent is a fundamental factor in the landlord's financial assessment. The related field for service charge provides additional financial context.
The data collected through this question is sensitive financial information. It is used for the landlord's assessment and may be shared with professional advisers. The privacy implications are notable, as rent information is commercially sensitive.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is straightforward for tenants who have their lease to hand. The currency input format is intuitive, and the mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Please describe the proposed transaction in your own words, including the commercial rationale invites the applicant to provide a narrative account of the proposed arrangement. This is a critical question because it allows the landlord to understand the full context and motivation behind the request. In commercial lease management, the commercial rationale is often as important as the technical details—understanding why the tenant wants to sublet, assign, or alter the premises helps the landlord assess the request's merits and potential risks.
The design of this question is effective. The multiline text input allows for a detailed response, and the instruction to include the commercial rationale encourages the applicant to provide context beyond the technical details. Making this field mandatory ensures that the landlord always has a narrative understanding of the request. This is particularly important for complex or unusual requests where the structured fields alone may not capture the full picture.
The data collected through this question is qualitative and rich in context. It provides insights into the tenant's business strategy and the commercial drivers behind the request. The privacy implications are notable, as the commercial rationale may reveal sensitive business information.
From a user experience standpoint, this question may require more effort than the structured fields, but it is an important opportunity for the applicant to present their case. The mandatory status is appropriate, as the narrative context is essential for the landlord's review.
The question Which part of the premises is affected? defines the spatial scope of the request. In commercial lease management, understanding which part of the premises is being sublet, assigned, or altered is essential for assessing the impact on the building, the remaining premises, and other occupants. A sublet of the entire premises raises different concerns than a sublet of a defined part, and the landlord needs to understand the exact boundaries to assess the feasibility and implications.
The design of this question is effective. The single-choice format with four options covers the common scenarios, while the conditional follow-ups for 'A defined part' and 'Shared use' ask for detailed descriptions of the boundaries and arrangements. This ensures that the landlord has the specific information needed for their assessment. Making this field mandatory is essential, as the spatial scope is a fundamental factor in the landlord's review.
The data collected through this question is structured and contextual. It defines the physical scope of the request and triggers relevant follow-up questions. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, the single-choice format is efficient and easy to use. The conditional follow-ups are well-designed and only appear when relevant. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Nature of the proposed arrangement categorizes the commercial terms of the proposed transaction. The options—sublease at market rent, below market, above market, assignment, licence, sharing with an affiliate, or other—each carry different legal and financial implications. A sublease at below-market rent, for example, may raise concerns about the tenant's ability to cover the head rent, while an assignment transfers the lease obligations entirely to the incoming party.
The design of this question is particularly effective. The seven options cover the full spectrum of arrangements, and the conditional follow-ups for each non-standard option ask for specific explanations and evidence. For example, a below-market sublease triggers a question about how the shortfall will be covered, while an above-market sublease triggers a question about market comparison evidence. This ensures that the landlord has the information needed to assess the commercial viability of the arrangement.
The data collected through this question is commercially sensitive and legally significant. It defines the financial terms of the arrangement and triggers relevant due diligence. The privacy implications are notable, as the commercial terms are confidential.
From a user experience standpoint, the single-choice format is efficient, and the conditional follow-ups are well-designed. The mandatory status is appropriate, as the nature of the arrangement is a fundamental factor in the landlord's assessment.
The question Does the proposed sub-tenant or assignee have any existing relationship with the tenant? addresses a critical due diligence concern. In commercial lease management, related-party transactions—such as sublets to group companies, affiliates, or shareholders—require special scrutiny. These arrangements may be structured to circumvent lease restrictions, shift liabilities, or create artificial rent structures. By disclosing the relationship, the landlord can assess whether the arrangement is at arm's length and whether any additional protections are needed.
The design of this question is effective. The yes/no format is clear, and the conditional follow-up for a 'Yes' response asks for a detailed description of the relationship and any common ownership or control. Making this field mandatory is essential, as related-party transactions are a common area of concern in commercial lease management.
The data collected through this question is sensitive and potentially legally significant. It may reveal corporate structures and ownership arrangements that are relevant to the landlord's assessment. The privacy implications are notable.
From a user experience standpoint, this question may cause some discomfort for tenants with related-party arrangements, but the mandatory status is appropriate for the landlord's due diligence.
The question Legal name of the proposed sub-tenant or assignee identifies the incoming party to the proposed arrangement. In commercial lease management, the landlord's assessment of the sub-tenant or assignee is one of the most critical aspects of the review process. The legal name is the primary identifier used for due diligence, credit checks, and legal documentation. Without this information, the landlord cannot begin their assessment of the incoming party's suitability.
The design of this question is straightforward and effective. The single-line text input with a placeholder example guides the applicant to provide the full legal name. Making this field mandatory is essential, as the identity of the incoming party is a fundamental factor in the landlord's assessment.
The data collected through this question is precise and verifiable. It enables the landlord to conduct due diligence on the incoming party. The privacy implications are notable, as the legal name of the incoming party is personal or corporate information that should be handled with care.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is easy to answer and unlikely to cause friction. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Can the incoming occupier provide audited or independently prepared financial statements for the last two financial years? is a cornerstone of the landlord's financial due diligence. In commercial lease management, the financial standing of the incoming party is a critical factor in the decision-making process. Audited or independently prepared financial statements provide the most reliable evidence of the incoming party's ability to meet the financial obligations of the sublet or assignment. Without this evidence, the landlord cannot adequately assess the risk of default.
The design of this question is effective. The yes/no format is clear, and the conditional follow-ups for both 'Yes' and 'No' responses are well-designed. The 'Yes' follow-up requests a file upload of the most recent financial statements, while the 'No' follow-up asks for an explanation and alternative evidence of financial standing. This ensures that the landlord has either the primary evidence or a reasonable explanation for its absence. Making this field mandatory is essential.
The data collected through this question is highly sensitive financial information. It is used for the landlord's due diligence and may be shared with professional advisers. The privacy implications are significant, and the landlord should handle this data with appropriate confidentiality and in accordance with applicable data protection regulations.
From a user experience standpoint, this question may be challenging for smaller or newer businesses that do not have audited accounts. However, the 'No' follow-up provides an alternative pathway, which is a thoughtful design choice. The mandatory status is appropriate given the importance of financial due diligence.
The question Has the incoming occupier ever been insolvent, entered administration, receivership, liquidation or any equivalent process? addresses one of the most significant risk factors in commercial lease management. A history of insolvency or equivalent proceedings raises serious concerns about the incoming party's financial stability and ability to meet lease obligations. The landlord needs this information to assess the risk of default and to determine whether additional protections—such as rent deposits or guarantees—are needed.
The design of this question is effective. The yes/no format is clear, and the conditional follow-up for a 'Yes' response asks for full details including dates, the process involved, and the outcome. This follow-up is essential because the context and outcome of insolvency proceedings can vary widely. Making this field mandatory is essential for the landlord's risk assessment.
The data collected through this question is highly sensitive and potentially legally significant. It relates to the incoming party's financial history and may be used in the landlord's decision-making process. The privacy implications are significant.
From a user experience standpoint, this question may be uncomfortable for applicants with a history of insolvency, but the mandatory status is appropriate for the landlord's due diligence.
The question Will the incoming occupier require any special licence, permit or regulatory approval to operate from the premises? addresses the regulatory dimension of the proposed arrangement. In commercial lease management, the landlord needs to ensure that the incoming party's business activities are compatible with the building's use, zoning, and regulatory environment. Certain businesses—such as food service, healthcare, financial services, and childcare—are subject to specific licensing requirements that may affect the building's operations, insurance, and compliance obligations.
The design of this question is effective. The yes/no format is clear, and the conditional follow-up for a 'Yes' response asks which categories of licence or approval are required. The multiple-choice options cover the common regulated activities, and the 'Other' option with a mandatory follow-up ensures that unusual activities are captured. Making this field mandatory is essential.
The data collected through this question is operationally and legally significant. It helps the landlord assess the regulatory implications of the proposed arrangement and ensure compliance with applicable laws and building rules.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is straightforward. The conditional follow-up is well-designed and only appears when relevant. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Please describe the proposed use of the premises in detail, including the activities carried on, the goods or services provided and any customer or visitor interaction provides the landlord with a comprehensive understanding of how the premises will be used and operated. In commercial lease management, the proposed use is a critical factor in assessing the impact on the building, its services, and the other occupants. A use that generates significant foot traffic, noise, or waste, for example, may require additional building services and may affect the amenity of other tenants.
The design of this question is effective. The multiline text input allows for a detailed response, and the specific prompts—activities, goods/services, and customer/visitor interaction—guide the applicant to cover the key aspects of the proposed use. Making this field mandatory ensures that the landlord always has a clear understanding of the proposed use.
The data collected through this question is qualitative and rich in context. It provides insights into the operational impact of the proposed use and helps the landlord assess compatibility with the building and other occupants. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question requires some effort but is an important opportunity for the applicant to present their case. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Does the proposed use fall within the permitted use stated in the lease? is a critical compliance check. In commercial lease management, any use outside the permitted use clause may require a variation of the lease, which is a more complex and time-consuming process. By asking the applicant to self-assess the compatibility of the proposed use with the permitted use, the form identifies potential issues early in the process and allows the landlord to address them proactively.
The design of this question is effective. The four options—entirely within, with variation, change of use required, and unsure—cover the common scenarios. The conditional follow-ups for each non-standard option ask for specific explanations and details. The 'Unsure' option is particularly helpful, as it acknowledges that some applicants may not be certain and provides a pathway for the landlord to advise.
The data collected through this question is legally significant and operationally valuable. It helps the landlord identify potential compliance issues and plan the review process accordingly. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is clear and well-designed. The mandatory status is appropriate, as the permitted use compliance is a fundamental factor in the landlord's assessment.
The question Will the operation generate significant noise, vibration, odour, dust or fumes? addresses the environmental and amenity impact of the proposed use. In commercial lease management, the landlord has a responsibility to protect the amenity of other occupants and the building's environment. Operations that generate significant noise, vibration, odour, dust, or fumes may require additional mitigation measures and may affect the landlord's willingness to consent.
The design of this question is effective. The yes/no format is clear, and the conditional follow-up for a 'Yes' response asks which specific impacts are anticipated. The nested follow-ups for noise, odour, and fumes ask for detailed descriptions of the source and mitigation measures. This ensures that the landlord has the specific information needed to assess the impact and determine whether additional conditions are required.
The data collected through this question is operationally significant and helps the landlord assess the environmental impact of the proposed use. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is clear and well-designed. The conditional follow-ups are only shown when relevant, reducing cognitive load. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Please provide a full description of the proposed works, including the existing condition and the intended finished condition is the foundational question for any alteration or fit-out request. In commercial lease management, the landlord needs a comprehensive understanding of the proposed works to assess their impact on the building, its structure, services, and compliance with building codes. The description should cover the scope, materials, methods, and expected outcomes of the works.
The design of this question is effective. The multiline text input allows for a detailed response, and the instruction to describe both the existing and intended finished conditions ensures that the landlord can visualize the transformation. Making this field mandatory is essential, as the description of works is the starting point for the landlord's technical review.
The data collected through this question is technical and detailed. It provides the basis for the landlord's assessment of the works and may be shared with professional advisers and building managers. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question requires significant effort but is essential for the landlord's review. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Will the works affect the structure, foundations, roof, façade or load-bearing elements of the building? addresses one of the most critical risk areas in commercial lease management. Structural alterations can have significant implications for the building's integrity, safety, and insurance. The landlord needs to assess the structural impact of the proposed works and may require the involvement of a structural engineer and additional approvals.
The design of this question is effective. The yes/no format is clear, and the conditional follow-up for a 'Yes' response asks for a detailed description of the structural impact and the structural engineer's assessment. Making this field mandatory is essential, as structural alterations require the highest level of scrutiny.
The data collected through this question is technically significant and may trigger additional review processes. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is clear and well-designed. The mandatory status is appropriate given the importance of structural safety.
The question Will the works require any permit, licence, consent or notification to a public authority? addresses the regulatory dimension of the proposed works. In commercial lease management, the landlord needs to ensure that all necessary permits and consents are obtained before works commence. Failure to obtain required permits can result in legal penalties, stop-work orders, and liability for the landlord.
The design of this question is effective. The yes/no format is clear, and the conditional follow-up for a 'Yes' response asks which categories of consent are expected. The multiple-choice options cover the common types of permits and consents, and the 'Other' option ensures that unusual requirements are captured. Making this field mandatory is essential.
The data collected through this question is legally and operationally significant. It helps the landlord ensure compliance with applicable regulations and plan the review process accordingly. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is clear and well-designed. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The questions Proposed works commencement date and Proposed works completion date define the temporal scope of the construction works. In commercial lease management, the landlord needs to understand the duration and timing of the works to assess the impact on the building, its services, and the other occupants. Works that extend over a long period or coincide with peak building usage may require additional management and mitigation measures.
The design of these questions is appropriate. The date input type ensures consistent, machine-readable data. Making both fields mandatory is essential, as the timing of the works is a fundamental factor in the landlord's assessment. The related field for estimated duration provides additional context.
The data collected through these questions is precise and operationally valuable. It helps the landlord plan for the works and coordinate with building management. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, these questions are straightforward. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The question During which hours will the works be carried out? addresses the operational impact of the construction works. In commercial lease management, the timing of works can significantly affect the building's operations and the amenity of other occupants. Works carried out during standard building hours may be less disruptive than those carried out during evenings, nights, or weekends, but they may also be constrained by building access and service availability.
The design of this question is effective. The five options cover the common working patterns, and the conditional follow-ups for out-of-hours and weekend working ask for explanations and confirmations of additional charges. Making this field mandatory is essential, as the working hours are a fundamental factor in the landlord's assessment of disruption.
The data collected through this question is operationally significant and helps the landlord plan for the works and manage expectations with other occupants. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is clear and well-designed. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Please describe the housekeeping, dust control, waste removal and site security arrangements during the works addresses the practical management of the construction site. In commercial lease management, the landlord needs to ensure that the works are carried out in a manner that minimizes disruption and maintains the building's standards. Poor housekeeping, inadequate dust control, and insufficient security can cause significant problems for other occupants and may result in complaints and liability.
The design of this question is effective. The multiline text input allows for a detailed response covering all aspects of site management. Making this field mandatory is essential, as the site management arrangements are a critical factor in the landlord's assessment.
The data collected through this question is operationally significant and helps the landlord ensure that the works are carried out responsibly. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question requires some effort but is important for the landlord's review. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Total estimated cost of the works provides the financial scale of the proposed alterations. In commercial lease management, the cost of the works is relevant to the landlord's assessment of the tenant's financial commitment and the value of the improvements to the premises. High-value works may indicate a significant investment by the tenant and may affect the landlord's willingness to consent, particularly if the works are likely to increase the premises' value.
The design of this question is appropriate. The currency input type ensures consistent data capture. Making this field mandatory is essential, as the cost of the works is a fundamental factor in the landlord's financial assessment. The related cost breakdown table provides detailed line-item information.
The data collected through this question is commercially sensitive. It provides the landlord with financial information that is used for assessment and may be shared with professional advisers. The privacy implications are notable.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is straightforward. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Will the tenant continue to pay the full rent and outgoings to the landlord regardless of the sublet arrangement? addresses a fundamental financial protection for the landlord. In commercial lease management, the tenant's obligation to pay rent is typically not affected by a sublet—the tenant remains primarily liable to the landlord regardless of whether they receive rent from the sub-tenant. This question confirms the tenant's understanding and acceptance of this obligation.
The design of this question is effective. The yes/no format is clear, and the conditional follow-ups are well-designed. The 'Yes' follow-up includes a checkbox confirming the tenant's primary liability, while the 'No' follow-up asks for an explanation of the proposed payment structure and how the landlord's income will be protected. Making this field mandatory is essential.
The data collected through this question is legally and financially significant. It confirms the tenant's understanding of their obligations and provides the basis for the landlord's financial protections. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is clear and well-designed. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Who will bear the cost of the landlord's reasonable legal, professional and supervisory fees? addresses the cost allocation for the landlord's review process. In commercial lease management, the landlord is typically entitled to recover reasonable costs incurred in reviewing and consenting to a sublet, assignment, or alteration request. This question confirms the applicant's understanding and acceptance of this cost responsibility.
The design of this question is effective. The single-choice format with four options covers the common cost allocation arrangements. Making this field mandatory is essential, as the cost allocation is a practical consideration that affects the landlord's willingness to proceed with the review.
The data collected through this question is financially significant and helps the landlord manage expectations around costs. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is clear and efficient. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The Professional team and contractors table provides a structured overview of all consultants, designers, and contractors engaged in connection with the request or works. In commercial lease management, the landlord needs to verify that all parties involved hold appropriate qualifications, licences, and insurance. The table format ensures that this information is captured consistently and can be easily reviewed.
The design of this table is effective. The columns for role, firm name, contact person, licence number, and insurance expiry date cover the key information needed for due diligence. The inclusion of example rows provides guidance on the expected level of detail. This structured approach is more efficient than free-text descriptions and enables systematic verification.
The data collected through this table is operationally significant and enables the landlord to verify the credentials of all parties involved. The privacy implications are moderate, as the table contains personal contact information for professionals.
From a user experience standpoint, the table format is clear and efficient. The example rows are helpful, and the structured columns guide the applicant to provide complete information.
The question Has the main contractor provided evidence of health and safety competence and a satisfactory safety record? addresses a critical safety and liability concern. In commercial lease management, the landlord has a duty of care to ensure that works carried out on their property are performed safely and competently. A contractor with a poor safety record or inadequate health and safety policies poses a significant risk to the building, its occupants, and the landlord's liability.
The design of this question is effective. The yes/no format is clear, and the conditional follow-ups for both 'Yes' and 'No' responses are well-designed. The 'Yes' follow-up requests a file upload of the contractor's health and safety policy and accident record, while the 'No' follow-up asks for an explanation of what evidence is outstanding and when it will be provided. Making this field mandatory is essential.
The data collected through this question is operationally and legally significant. It helps the landlord ensure that the works are carried out safely and competently. The privacy implications are moderate.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is clear and well-designed. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The Insurance arrangements table provides a structured overview of the insurance policies in place for the proposed arrangement. In commercial lease management, insurance is a critical risk management tool. The landlord needs to verify that all required insurance is in place, that coverage limits are adequate, and that policies will remain current throughout the term of the sublet and the duration of any works.
The design of this table is effective. The columns for policy type, insurer, policy number, coverage limit, and expiry date cover the key information needed for verification. The example rows provide guidance on the expected level of detail. The related checkboxes for insurance undertakings further reinforce the importance of maintaining adequate coverage.
The data collected through this table is operationally significant and enables the landlord to verify the insurance arrangements. The privacy implications are moderate, as the table contains financial and policy information.
From a user experience standpoint, the table format is clear and efficient. The mandatory status of the related checkboxes ensures that the applicant acknowledges their insurance obligations.
The question Has a risk assessment been prepared for the proposed works? addresses the safety and risk management dimension of the proposed works. In commercial lease management, a risk assessment is a fundamental document that identifies potential hazards and outlines mitigation measures. The landlord needs to review this assessment to ensure that the works can be carried out safely and that the risks to the building and its occupants are adequately managed.
The design of this question is effective. The yes/no format is clear, and the conditional follow-ups for both 'Yes' and 'No' responses are well-designed. The 'Yes' follow-up requests a file upload of the risk assessment and method statement, while the 'No' follow-up asks when the assessment will be submitted. Making this field mandatory is essential.
The data collected through this question is operationally and legally significant. It helps the landlord ensure that the works are carried out safely. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is clear and well-designed. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Are you aware of any restriction, covenant, easement, planning condition or building rule that could prevent or limit the proposed arrangement or works? addresses the legal and regulatory constraints on the proposed arrangement. In commercial lease management, restrictions and covenants can significantly impact the feasibility of a sublet or alteration. The landlord needs to be aware of any such restrictions to assess whether the proposed arrangement can be approved and whether any additional consents or variations are needed.
The design of this question is effective. The yes/no format is clear, and the conditional follow-up for a 'Yes' response asks for a description of the restriction and how the applicant proposes to deal with it. Making this field mandatory is essential, as undisclosed restrictions can lead to significant legal complications.
The data collected through this question is legally significant and helps the landlord identify potential obstacles to the proposed arrangement. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is clear and well-designed. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The question Will the arrangement involve any party subject to trade sanctions, export controls or similar restrictions that the landlord should be aware of? addresses the regulatory compliance dimension of the proposed arrangement. In commercial lease management, the landlord may have obligations under trade sanctions and export control regulations. Engaging with a sanctioned party can result in significant legal penalties and reputational damage.
The design of this question is effective. The yes/no format is clear, and the conditional follow-up for a 'Yes' response asks for full details. Making this field mandatory is essential, as sanctions compliance is a critical legal requirement.
The data collected through this question is legally significant and helps the landlord ensure compliance with applicable regulations. The privacy implications are notable.
From a user experience standpoint, this question is clear and well-designed. The mandatory status is appropriate.
The matrix rating question asking the applicant to rate the anticipated impact of the proposal on various aspects of the building is an innovative and effective design choice. In commercial lease management, the landlord needs to understand the broader impact of the proposed arrangement on the building, its services, and the other occupants. The matrix format allows the applicant to provide a structured assessment across seven key dimensions, from building services capacity to noise and air quality.
The design of this question is particularly effective. The matrix format is efficient and easy to use, and the five-point scale from 'No impact' to 'Severe impact' provides meaningful granularity. The seven sub-questions cover the key areas of concern for a landlord, and the structured format enables systematic comparison across different requests.
The data collected through this question is qualitative but structured, providing the landlord with a comprehensive overview of the proposal's impact. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, the matrix format is intuitive and efficient. The question is well-placed within the sustainability and building impact section.
The question Please indicate which documents are attached to this submission provides a checklist of supporting documents that may accompany the request. In commercial lease management, supporting documents are essential for the landlord's review. Drawings, specifications, insurance certificates, and legal agreements provide the detailed information needed to assess the feasibility and implications of the proposed arrangement.
The design of this question is effective. The multiple-choice format with 14 options covers the full range of supporting documents commonly required. The related file upload fields and document register table provide additional structure for managing the submitted documents. This comprehensive approach ensures that the landlord has all the information needed for their review.
The data collected through this question is operationally significant and helps the landlord manage the review process. The privacy implications are moderate, as the supporting documents may contain sensitive information.
From a user experience standpoint, the checklist format is clear and efficient. The related file upload fields and document register provide a structured approach to document management.
The declaration checkboxes and signature block at the end of the form serve as formal undertakings by the applicant. In commercial lease management, these declarations are legally significant—they confirm the applicant's authority, the accuracy of the information provided, and their acceptance of the landlord's conditions and fees. The declarations also confirm that no sublet, assignment, occupation, or works will commence before the landlord's written approval. The signature block—comprising the full name, position, date, and signature of the authorised signatory—completes the formal submission.
The design of these elements is effective. Five mandatory checkboxes cover the key undertakings: authority to submit, acceptance of conditions, no premature commencement, provision of further information, and acceptance of landlord's fees. The four mandatory signature fields—name, position, date, and signature—provide a complete and verifiable record of the submission. The signature input type ensures a formal, legally recognized form of authentication.
The data collected through these declarations and the signature block is legally significant and forms part of the contractual record. The privacy implications are notable, as the signature is personal information.
From a user experience standpoint, the checkboxes are clear and easy to complete, and the signature block is straightforward. The mandatory status is appropriate, as these declarations are essential for the legal validity of the request.
The landlord use only section is a well-designed addition to the form. In commercial lease management, having a dedicated section for the landlord's review and decision ensures that the approval process is documented and traceable. The section includes fields for the receiver, date received, request reference, decision, quality rating, fees, target response date, and internal notes.
The design of this section is effective. The single-choice decision field with four options—approved without conditions, approved subject to conditions, deferred, and refused—covers the common outcomes. The conditional follow-ups for each non-standard outcome ask for specific details. The star rating for submission quality and the currency field for fees provide additional useful information.
The data collected through this section is operationally significant and helps the landlord manage the approval process. The privacy implications are minimal.
From a user experience standpoint, this section is clearly labeled as being for landlord use only, which prevents confusion. The structured fields enable efficient processing and record-keeping.
The Commercial Lease Sublet & Alteration Approval Request Form is one of the most comprehensive and well-structured forms in its category. Its strengths include: a logical, section-based structure that guides the applicant through the process; extensive use of conditional follow-up questions that tailor the form to the specific type of request; structured input types (tables, checkboxes, file uploads, matrices) that ensure consistent and high-quality data collection; comprehensive coverage of all critical dimensions including legal compliance, financial arrangements, insurance, risk management, and sustainability; and a dedicated landlord-use section that supports the entire approval workflow. The form also demonstrates strong attention to user experience through placeholder examples, clear instructions, and section-level guidance.
However, the form's comprehensiveness is also its primary weakness. The sheer volume of questions—numbering well over 100 when including follow-ups—may present a significant time commitment for applicants, potentially leading to form abandonment or incomplete submissions. The form could benefit from a progress indicator, a save-and-resume feature, and a summary page that allows applicants to review their responses before submission. Additionally, some sections—such as the sustainability and building impact section—may be less relevant for simple alteration requests and could be made conditional based on the type of approval selected. Despite these considerations, the form's thoroughness is justified by the legal and financial complexity of commercial lease subletting and alterations, and its design reflects best practices in form architecture and data collection.
Mandatory Question Analysis for Commercial Lease Sublet & Alteration Approval Request Form
Important Note: This analysis provides strategic insights to help you get the most from your form's submission data for powerful follow-up actions and better outcomes. Please remove this content before publishing the form to the public.
Question: Date of this request
Justification: This field is essential for establishing the submission timeline and serves as the primary reference point for the landlord's review process. It determines when the clock starts for any statutory or contractual response periods and enables accurate tracking of the request through to resolution. Without a submission date, there is no way to establish the timeline for the landlord's obligations or to verify compliance with any deadlines. Making this field mandatory ensures that every request is properly dated and traceable.
Question: What type of approval are you requesting?
Justification: This is the pivotal branching question that determines the entire review pathway and which sections of the form are most relevant. Each type of approval—sublet, assignment, licence, or alteration—triggers different legal requirements, documentation needs, and review processes. Without knowing the type of request, the landlord cannot begin their assessment or allocate appropriate resources. The mandatory status ensures that the form can be properly tailored to the specific request type through conditional logic.
Question: Please describe which part of the premises you intend to sublet and how it will be demised or separated
Justification: When a sublet of part of the premises is selected, the landlord needs to understand the exact spatial scope and how the sublet area will be physically separated from the retained area. This information is critical for assessing the feasibility of the demising arrangement, its impact on building services and access, and compliance with building regulations. Without this detail, the landlord cannot evaluate whether the proposed division is practical or legally sound. The mandatory status ensures that partial sublets are always accompanied by a clear description of the boundaries.
Question: Will you retain any presence or staff at the premises after subletting the entire area?
Justification: When the entire premises are being sublet, the landlord needs to know whether the original tenant will retain any presence or staff at the location. This affects the operational dynamics of the premises, the allocation of building services, and the landlord's understanding of who will be occupying the space on a day-to-day basis. It also has implications for the tenant's continued liability and the practical management of the sublet arrangement. The mandatory status ensures that the landlord has a complete picture of the occupancy arrangements.
Question: Is this request related to, or a variation of, a request previously submitted to the landlord?
Justification: Establishing whether the current request relates to a previous submission is essential for maintaining continuity in the approval process and avoiding duplication of effort. It allows the landlord to link the request to prior correspondence, decisions, or conditions and ensures consistency in the review. Without this information, the landlord may process the request in isolation, potentially issuing conflicting decisions or overlooking relevant prior conditions. The mandatory status ensures that the request's history is always captured.
Question: Please provide the previous request reference and date
Justification: When the request is identified as a variation of a previous submission, the reference number and date of the prior request are essential for retrieving the relevant file and understanding the evolution of the proposal. These identifiers enable efficient cross-referencing and ensure that the landlord can review the full history of the request. Without this information, the landlord cannot link the current submission to the prior one, leading to potential delays and inconsistencies. The mandatory status ensures that related requests are always properly linked.
Question: Please state the deadline and the reason it applies
Justification: When a specific deadline is indicated, the landlord needs both the date and the reason to assess the urgency and legitimacy of the request. The deadline enables the landlord to prioritize their review and manage expectations, while the reason provides context that helps determine whether the deadline is driven by contractual obligations, financing requirements, or other external factors. Without this information, the landlord cannot effectively manage time-sensitive requests or communicate realistic timelines to the applicant. The mandatory status ensures that deadline requests are always accompanied by sufficient context.
Question: Registered legal name of the tenant
Justification: The registered legal name is the primary identifier of the tenant entity bound by the lease and is essential for verifying that the request is being made by the correct party. It is used for cross-referencing with the lease document, corporate registries, and all legal correspondence. Without this information, the landlord cannot confirm the applicant's identity or authority to make the request. The mandatory status ensures that every request is properly attributed to the correct legal entity.
Question: Legal form of the tenant entity
Justification: The legal form of the tenant entity determines the applicable due diligence standards, liability framework, and regulatory requirements for the landlord's assessment. Different legal forms—such as limited companies, partnerships, trusts, or sole traders—carry different levels of covenant strength and may require different documentation. Without this information, the landlord cannot apply the appropriate review criteria or assess the tenant's legal standing. The mandatory status ensures that the tenant's corporate structure is always captured.
Question: Please specify the legal form of the entity
Justification: When the 'Other' option is selected for the legal form, the specific description is essential for the landlord to understand the entity's structure and apply the appropriate due diligence standards. Unusual entity types may require additional documentation or verification, and without a clear description, the landlord cannot assess the entity's legal standing. The mandatory status ensures that non-standard entity types are always properly identified.
Question: Registered address of the tenant entity
Justification: The registered address is a fundamental piece of identifying information for the tenant entity and is used for legal correspondence, service of notices, and verification of the entity's existence and standing. Without this information, the landlord cannot serve formal notices or verify the tenant's corporate registration. The mandatory status ensures that the landlord always has a reliable address for all formal communications.
Question: Primary contact person for this request
Justification: Identifying a primary contact person is essential for efficient communication throughout the approval process. The landlord needs a designated point of contact for clarifications, follow-up requests, and coordination of the review. Without this information, the landlord may struggle to reach the tenant promptly, leading to delays and potential misunderstandings. The mandatory status ensures that the landlord always has a clear point of contact.
Question: Job title or position of the contact person
Justification: The job title of the contact person provides context about their authority and role within the tenant organization. This helps the landlord assess whether the contact person has the authority to make decisions and commitments on behalf of the tenant. Without this information, the landlord may be uncertain about the contact person's level of authority, potentially leading to miscommunications or delays in decision-making. The mandatory status ensures that the contact person's role is always clear.
Question: Email address of the contact person
Justification: The email address is the primary channel for formal communication between the landlord and the tenant throughout the approval process. It is used for sending correspondence, requesting additional information, and issuing the landlord's decision. Without a valid email address, the landlord cannot communicate efficiently with the applicant, leading to significant delays. The mandatory status ensures that the landlord always has a reliable communication channel.
Question: Telephone number (including country and area code)
Justification: The telephone number provides an alternative communication channel for urgent matters, clarifications, and time-sensitive discussions during the approval process. While email is the primary channel, phone contact is essential for resolving complex issues quickly and for situations where written communication is insufficient. Without a telephone number, the landlord may be unable to reach the applicant in urgent situations. The mandatory status ensures that the landlord always has a voice communication option.
Question: Is this request being submitted by an agent, lawyer or other representative acting for the tenant?
Justification: The landlord needs to know whether the request is being submitted by the tenant directly or through a representative, as this affects the verification of authority and the communication process. Representatives may have different levels of authority and may require additional documentation to confirm their mandate. Without this information, the landlord cannot verify who is making the request or whether they have the authority to do so. The mandatory status ensures that the submission authority is always clear.
Question: Please provide the representative's name, firm, contact details and confirm the authority under which they act
Justification: When a representative is submitting the request, the landlord needs complete details of the representative and confirmation of their authority to act on behalf of the tenant. This is essential for legal verification, communication purposes, and ensuring that the representative has the mandate to make commitments. Without this information, the landlord cannot verify the representative's authority or communicate effectively. The mandatory status ensures that representative submissions are always properly documented.
Question: How many years has the tenant been in occupation of the premises?
Justification: The length of occupation is a key indicator of the tenant's reliability, stability, and track record in meeting lease obligations. A long-standing tenant with a clean record is generally viewed more favorably than a recent occupant, and this information helps the landlord contextualize the request. Without this data point, the landlord cannot assess the tenant's history or the maturity of their occupation. The mandatory status ensures that this important contextual factor is always captured.
Question: Has the tenant ever been in breach of the lease, received a formal notice, or been in dispute with the landlord?
Justification: The tenant's compliance history is one of the most critical due diligence factors in the landlord's decision-making process. A history of breaches, formal notices, or disputes raises significant red flags about the tenant's reliability and may influence the landlord's willingness to consent to the request. Without this information, the landlord cannot conduct a complete risk assessment. The mandatory status ensures that the landlord always has visibility of the tenant's compliance record.
Question: Please describe the circumstances, the dates involved and how the matter was resolved
Justification: When a history of breach or dispute is disclosed, the landlord needs detailed information about the circumstances, timeline, and resolution to assess the severity and relevance of the issue. A minor, resolved breach is very different from an ongoing, unresolved dispute, and the landlord needs this nuance to make an informed decision. Without this context, the landlord cannot properly evaluate the risk posed by the tenant's compliance history. The mandatory status ensures that disclosed issues are always accompanied by sufficient context.
Question: Building or estate name
Justification: The building or estate name is essential for identifying the property in question and routing the request to the appropriate building management team. Different buildings may have different rules, service levels, and management structures, and the landlord needs to know which property the request relates to. Without this information, the landlord cannot process the request efficiently or engage the correct building team. The mandatory status ensures that the property is always identified.
Question: Full address of the premises
Justification: The full address provides the precise location of the leased premises and is essential for identifying the exact unit within the building, cross-referencing with the lease document, and ensuring that the request is processed for the correct property. Without this information, the landlord may process the request for the wrong premises, leading to significant errors and delays. The mandatory status ensures that the premises are always precisely identified.
Question: Suite, unit or floor identifier
Justification: The suite, unit, or floor identifier provides the specific location of the premises within the building and is essential for accurate identification and cross-referencing. In multi-tenant buildings, this identifier distinguishes the premises from other units and ensures that the request is processed for the correct space. Without this information, the landlord cannot verify the exact premises being discussed. The mandatory status ensures that the specific unit is always identified.
Question: Total leased area of the premises
Justification: The total leased area is a fundamental data point for assessing the scale of the premises and the proportional impact of any sublet or alteration. It is used to calculate the percentage of the premises affected, assess the financial implications, and determine the appropriate level of scrutiny. Without this information, the landlord cannot assess the spatial scope of the request in context. The mandatory status ensures that the premises area is always captured.
Question: Unit of measurement for the leased area
Justification: The unit of measurement ensures that the leased area data is interpreted correctly and consistently. Different regions and property types use different units of measurement, and ambiguity in this regard can lead to significant errors in assessment. Without this information, the landlord cannot accurately interpret the area data or compare it with other properties. The mandatory status ensures that the measurement unit is always specified.
Question: Lease reference/lease number
Justification: The lease reference is the primary key used to retrieve the lease file and cross-reference with the landlord's records. It ensures that the request is processed for the correct lease and enables efficient retrieval of the relevant documentation. Without this reference, the landlord may struggle to locate the lease document, leading to delays and potential errors. The mandatory status ensures that the lease is always properly identified.
Question: Lease commencement date
Justification: The lease commencement date defines the start of the lease term and is essential for verifying the tenant's length of occupation, calculating the remaining term, and assessing the temporal feasibility of the proposed arrangement. Without this date, the landlord cannot establish the lease timeline or verify the tenant's occupation history. The mandatory status ensures that the lease term is always properly defined.
Question: Lease expiry date
Justification: The lease expiry date defines the end of the lease term and is critical for assessing whether the proposed sublet, assignment, or alteration can be accommodated within the remaining term. A sublet that extends beyond the lease expiry raises significant legal issues, and the landlord needs this date to evaluate the temporal feasibility of the request. Without this information, the landlord cannot assess the duration implications. The mandatory status ensures that the lease term is always properly defined.
Question: Permitted use stated in the lease
Justification: The permitted use clause defines the boundaries of the tenant's occupation and is one of the most important provisions in any commercial lease. Any proposed sublet, assignment, or change of use must be assessed against the permitted use to determine whether it falls within the lease's terms. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the compatibility of the proposed use with the lease. The mandatory status ensures that the permitted use is always captured.
Question: Current annual base rent payable for the whole premises
Justification: The current annual base rent provides the financial baseline for the landlord's assessment and is essential for evaluating the commercial viability of any sublet arrangement. It helps the landlord assess whether the proposed sub-tenant's rent is reasonable and whether the tenant will continue to meet their obligations. Without this information, the landlord cannot conduct a complete financial assessment. The mandatory status ensures that the rent is always captured.
Question: Does the lease contain options to renew, extend or break?
Justification: Renewal, extension, and break options are significant lease provisions that affect the long-term value and stability of the arrangement. A sublet or assignment that coincides with a break option may raise concerns about continuity of occupation, and the landlord needs this information to assess the temporal dynamics of the lease. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the long-term implications of the request. The mandatory status ensures that the lease's temporal flexibility is always captured.
Question: Please summarise the renewal, extension or break provisions and the notice periods involved
Justification: When renewal, extension, or break options exist, the specific terms and notice periods are essential for the landlord to assess the temporal implications of the proposed arrangement. The details of these provisions can significantly impact the landlord's decision, particularly regarding the duration and stability of the sublet or assignment. Without this information, the landlord cannot fully evaluate the lease's temporal dynamics. The mandatory status ensures that these critical provisions are always detailed.
Question: Please describe the proposed transaction in your own words, including the commercial rationale
Justification: The narrative description and commercial rationale provide essential context that structured fields alone cannot convey. Understanding the motivation behind the request helps the landlord assess its merits, risks, and alignment with the lease terms. Without this narrative context, the landlord may lack the understanding needed to make a fully informed decision. The mandatory status ensures that every request is accompanied by a clear explanation of the proposed arrangement.
Question: Which part of the premises is affected?
Justification: The spatial scope of the request is a fundamental factor in the landlord's assessment, as it determines the impact on the building, the remaining premises, and other occupants. A sublet of the entire premises raises different concerns than a sublet of a defined part, and the landlord needs to understand the exact boundaries to assess feasibility. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the spatial implications of the request. The mandatory status ensures that the affected area is always identified.
Question: Please describe the exact boundaries of the affected area and how it will be physically separated or identified
Justification: When a defined part of the premises is affected, the landlord needs to understand the exact boundaries and the physical separation arrangements to assess the feasibility of the demising. This information is critical for evaluating compliance with building regulations, access arrangements, and the impact on building services. Without this detail, the landlord cannot assess whether the proposed division is practical or legally sound. The mandatory status ensures that partial arrangements are always clearly defined.
Question: Please describe how shared use will work in practice, including access, hours and shared facilities
Justification: Shared use arrangements require careful assessment of practical logistics, including access, operating hours, and shared facilities. The landlord needs to understand how the arrangement will work on a day-to-day basis to assess its impact on the building and other occupants. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the practical feasibility of the shared use arrangement. The mandatory status ensures that shared use proposals are always accompanied by operational details.
Question: Proposed start date of the sublet, assignment or licence
Justification: The proposed start date is essential for assessing the temporal feasibility of the arrangement and planning the landlord's review and consent process. It helps the landlord determine whether the proposed timeline is realistic and whether any conditions need to be met before the arrangement commences. Without this information, the landlord cannot assess the timing implications of the request. The mandatory status ensures that the proposed timeline is always captured.
Question: Will the proposed arrangement extend beyond the expiry date of the head lease?
Justification: An arrangement that extends beyond the head lease expiry raises significant legal issues, including the rights of the sub-tenant or assignee and the landlord's ability to recover possession. The landlord needs to assess these implications and may require additional protections or conditions. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the temporal risks of the proposed arrangement. The mandatory status ensures that this critical temporal issue is always addressed.
Question: Please explain how this will be dealt with and what protections are proposed for the sub-tenant and the landlord
Justification: When the arrangement extends beyond the head lease expiry, the landlord needs to understand the proposed protections for all parties to assess whether the arrangement is legally sound and commercially viable. Without this explanation, the landlord cannot evaluate the risk of the arrangement or determine whether additional conditions are needed. The mandatory status ensures that this critical issue is always accompanied by a proposed solution.
Question: Nature of the proposed arrangement
Justification: The nature of the arrangement—whether it is a sublease at market, below-market, or above-market rent, an assignment, a licence, or a sharing arrangement—determines the legal framework, financial implications, and due diligence requirements for the landlord's assessment. Each type of arrangement carries different risks and requires different levels of scrutiny. Without this information, the landlord cannot apply the appropriate review criteria. The mandatory status ensures that the arrangement type is always identified.
Question: Does the proposed sub-tenant or assignee have any existing relationship with the tenant?
Justification: Related-party transactions require special scrutiny in commercial lease management, as they may be structured to circumvent lease restrictions, shift liabilities, or create artificial rent structures. The landlord needs to disclose and assess any existing relationships to ensure that the arrangement is at arm's length and that appropriate protections are in place. Without this information, the landlord cannot conduct a complete due diligence review. The mandatory status ensures that related-party relationships are always disclosed.
Question: Please describe the relationship and disclose any common ownership or control
Justification: When a relationship exists between the tenant and the incoming party, the landlord needs detailed information about the nature of the relationship and any common ownership or control to assess whether the arrangement is at arm's length. This information is critical for evaluating the commercial viability of the arrangement and determining whether additional protections are needed. Without this detail, the landlord cannot properly assess the related-party risks. The mandatory status ensures that relationship details are always provided.
Question: Legal name of the proposed sub-tenant or assignee
Justification: The legal name of the incoming party is the primary identifier used for due diligence, credit checks, and legal documentation. Without this information, the landlord cannot begin their assessment of the incoming party's suitability or conduct any verification checks. The mandatory status ensures that the incoming party is always properly identified.
Question: Legal form of the incoming occupier
Justification: The legal form of the incoming occupier determines the applicable due diligence standards and liability framework for the landlord's assessment. Different legal forms carry different levels of covenant strength and may require different documentation. Without this information, the landlord cannot apply the appropriate review criteria. The mandatory status ensures that the incoming party's corporate structure is always captured.
Question: Registered address of the incoming occupier
Justification: The registered address of the incoming occupier is essential for legal correspondence, verification of the entity's existence, and service of any formal notices. Without this information, the landlord cannot verify the incoming party's standing or communicate effectively with them. The mandatory status ensures that the incoming party's address is always captured.
Question: Nature of the incoming occupier's business
Justification: The nature of the incoming occupier's business is critical for assessing compatibility with the permitted use, the building's operations, and the other occupants. Certain business activities may require additional licences, generate significant impacts, or be incompatible with the building's use. Without this information, the landlord cannot assess the operational implications of the proposed arrangement. The mandatory status ensures that the business activity is always identified.
Question: Authorised signatory of the incoming occupier
Justification: The authorised signatory of the incoming occupier is essential for verifying the authority to enter into the proposed arrangement and for executing any legal documentation. Without this information, the landlord cannot confirm that the incoming party has the authority to commit to the arrangement. The mandatory status ensures that the signatory is always identified.
Question: Contact email of the incoming occupier
Justification: The contact email of the incoming occupier is essential for direct communication during the due diligence process and for any subsequent correspondence related to the arrangement. Without this information, the landlord may be unable to communicate with the incoming party directly. The mandatory status ensures that the landlord always has a communication channel with the incoming party.
Question: Contact telephone of the incoming occupier
Justification: The contact telephone of the incoming occupier provides an alternative communication channel for urgent matters and time-sensitive discussions during the due diligence process. Without this information, the landlord may be unable to reach the incoming party in urgent situations. The mandatory status ensures that voice communication is always available.
Question: Can the incoming occupier provide audited or independently prepared financial statements for the last two financial years?
Justification: Financial statements are the cornerstone of the landlord's financial due diligence and provide the most reliable evidence of the incoming party's ability to meet lease obligations. Without this evidence, the landlord cannot adequately assess the risk of default and may need to require additional protections. The mandatory status ensures that the financial standing of the incoming party is always addressed.
Question: Please upload the most recent financial statements
Justification: When financial statements are available, the landlord needs to review them to assess the incoming party's financial health, profitability, and ability to meet lease obligations. The uploaded documents provide the primary evidence for the landlord's financial assessment. Without these documents, the landlord cannot conduct a complete financial review. The mandatory status ensures that available financial evidence is always provided.
Question: Please explain why financial statements are not available and what alternative evidence of financial standing can be provided
Justification: When financial statements are not available, the landlord needs an explanation and alternative evidence to assess the incoming party's financial standing. This ensures that the landlord can still conduct a meaningful financial assessment even in the absence of audited accounts. Without this information, the landlord has no basis for evaluating the incoming party's financial risk. The mandatory status ensures that alternative evidence is always provided.
Question: Has the incoming occupier ever been insolvent, entered administration, receivership, liquidation or any equivalent process?
Justification: A history of insolvency or equivalent proceedings is one of the most significant risk factors in commercial lease management and directly affects the landlord's assessment of the incoming party's reliability. The landlord needs this information to determine whether additional protections—such as rent deposits or guarantees—are needed. Without this information, the landlord cannot conduct a complete risk assessment. The mandatory status ensures that insolvency history is always disclosed.
Question: Please provide full details including dates, the process involved and the outcome
Justification: When insolvency history is disclosed, the landlord needs detailed information about the dates, process, and outcome to assess the severity and relevance of the issue. A company that was successfully restructured through administration is very different from one that was liquidated, and the landlord needs this nuance to make an informed decision. Without this context, the landlord cannot properly evaluate the risk. The mandatory status ensures that disclosed insolvency matters are always accompanied by sufficient detail.
Question: Is the incoming occupier subject to any current or pending litigation, regulatory investigation or enforcement action relevant to its business?
Justification: Current or pending litigation, regulatory investigations, or enforcement actions can significantly impact the incoming party's ability to meet lease obligations and may expose the landlord to reputational or legal risk. The landlord needs this information to assess the risk of the proposed arrangement and determine whether additional protections are needed. Without this information, the landlord cannot conduct a complete due diligence review. The mandatory status ensures that litigation and regulatory exposure is always disclosed.
Question: Please summarise the matters, their status and the potential impact on the occupation of the premises
Justification: When litigation or regulatory matters are disclosed, the landlord needs a summary of the matters, their current status, and the potential impact on the occupation of the premises to assess the risk. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate whether the matters are likely to affect the incoming party's ability to perform under the arrangement. The mandatory status ensures that disclosed matters are always accompanied by sufficient context.
Question: Will the incoming occupier require any special licence, permit or regulatory approval to operate from the premises?
Justification: Special licences and regulatory approvals can significantly impact the building's operations, insurance, and compliance obligations. The landlord needs to ensure that the incoming party's business activities are compatible with the building's use and that all necessary approvals will be obtained. Without this information, the landlord cannot assess the regulatory implications of the proposed arrangement. The mandatory status ensures that regulatory requirements are always identified.
Question: Please describe the proposed use of the premises in detail, including the activities carried on, the goods or services provided and any customer or visitor interaction
Justification: A detailed description of the proposed use is essential for the landlord to assess the operational impact on the building, its services, and the other occupants. The use determines the level of foot traffic, noise, waste, and demand on building services, all of which affect the landlord's assessment. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the compatibility of the proposed use with the building. The mandatory status ensures that the proposed use is always clearly described.
Question: Does the proposed use fall within the permitted use stated in the lease?
Justification: Compliance with the permitted use clause is a fundamental requirement of any commercial lease, and any use outside this clause may require a variation of the lease. The landlord needs to assess whether the proposed use falls within the permitted use to determine the appropriate approval pathway. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the legal compliance of the proposed use. The mandatory status ensures that permitted use compliance is always addressed.
Question: Proposed operating hours (weekdays)
Justification: The proposed operating hours are essential for assessing the impact on the building's services, security, and the other occupants. Extended or unusual operating hours may require additional building services and may affect the amenity of other tenants. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the operational impact of the proposed use. The mandatory status ensures that the operating hours are always captured.
Question: Will the premises be occupied outside of normal building operating hours?
Justification: Out-of-hours occupation can significantly impact the building's security, services, and operating costs. The landlord needs to assess whether extended hours are required and what additional services may be needed. Without this information, the landlord cannot plan for the operational implications of the proposed use. The mandatory status ensures that out-of-hours requirements are always identified.
Question: Please state the extended hours required, the number of staff involved and any additional security, cleaning or air-conditioning services needed
Justification: When extended hours are required, the landlord needs specific details about the hours, staffing, and additional services to assess the operational and financial impact. This information is essential for planning the building's services and determining whether additional charges are warranted. Without these details, the landlord cannot properly plan for the extended occupation. The mandatory status ensures that extended hour requirements are always fully described.
Question: Will the operation generate significant noise, vibration, odour, dust or fumes?
Justification: Environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, odour, dust, and fumes can significantly affect the amenity of other occupants and the building's environment. The landlord needs to assess these impacts and determine whether mitigation measures or conditions are required. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the environmental implications of the proposed use. The mandatory status ensures that environmental impacts are always assessed.
Question: Will any hazardous, flammable, controlled or environmentally sensitive materials be stored or used on the premises?
Justification: The storage or use of hazardous, flammable, controlled, or environmentally sensitive materials poses significant safety, insurance, and regulatory risks. The landlord needs to assess these risks and ensure that appropriate safety measures and insurance coverage are in place. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the safety implications of the proposed use. The mandatory status ensures that hazardous material risks are always identified.
Question: Please list each substance, its classification, the quantities stored, the storage method and the safety data sheets available
Justification: When hazardous materials are involved, the landlord needs detailed information about each substance, including its classification, quantities, storage method, and safety data sheets to assess the risks and ensure compliance with safety regulations. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the safety implications or determine whether additional conditions are needed. The mandatory status ensures that hazardous material details are always provided.
Question: Will signage, branding or external identification be displayed?
Justification: Signage and external identification can affect the building's appearance, other tenants' rights, and compliance with building rules and planning regulations. The landlord needs to assess the proposed signage and determine whether it is acceptable. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the visual and regulatory implications of the proposed use. The mandatory status ensures that signage plans are always disclosed.
Question: Please describe the type, size, location and illumination of each sign
Justification: When signage is proposed, the landlord needs specific details about the type, size, location, and illumination to assess compliance with building rules, planning regulations, and the rights of other tenants. Without these details, the landlord cannot evaluate whether the proposed signage is acceptable. The mandatory status ensures that signage details are always provided.
Question: Please provide a full description of the proposed works, including the existing condition and the intended finished condition
Justification: A comprehensive description of the proposed works is the starting point for the landlord's technical review and is essential for assessing the impact on the building, its structure, services, and compliance with building codes. Without this description, the landlord cannot begin their assessment of the alteration request. The mandatory status ensures that the works are always clearly described.
Question: Will the works be temporary or permanent?
Justification: The temporary or permanent nature of the works affects the landlord's assessment of the long-term impact on the premises, the reinstatement obligations, and the value of the improvements. Permanent works may increase the premises' value, while temporary works raise questions about reinstatement. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the temporal implications of the works. The mandatory status ensures that the nature of the works is always identified.
Question: Will you reinstate the premises to their original condition at the end of the lease?
Justification: The reinstatement obligation is a critical aspect of any alteration request and affects the landlord's ability to recover the premises in their original condition. The landlord needs to understand the tenant's intentions regarding reinstatement to assess the long-term implications of the works. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the reinstatement risks. The mandatory status ensures that reinstatement intentions are always addressed.
Question: Will the works affect the structure, foundations, roof, façade or load-bearing elements of the building?
Justification: Structural alterations can have significant implications for the building's integrity, safety, and insurance. The landlord needs to assess the structural impact and may require the involvement of a structural engineer and additional approvals. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the structural risks of the proposed works. The mandatory status ensures that structural impacts are always assessed.
Question: Please describe the structural impact and provide details of the structural engineer's assessment and calculations
Justification: When structural impacts are identified, the landlord needs detailed information about the structural impact and the engineer's assessment to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the works. Without this information, the landlord cannot assess whether the proposed structural changes are safe and compliant. The mandatory status ensures that structural details are always provided.
Question: Will the works affect the building's mechanical, electrical, plumbing, drainage, fire or life-safety systems?
Justification: Alterations to building systems can affect the performance, safety, and compliance of the entire building. The landlord needs to assess the impact on these systems and ensure that their integrity and performance will be maintained. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the systems risks of the proposed works. The mandatory status ensures that building systems impacts are always assessed.
Question: Please describe each system affected, the proposed modifications and how system integrity and performance will be maintained
Justification: When building systems are affected, the landlord needs detailed information about each system, the proposed modifications, and the measures to maintain system integrity and performance. Without this information, the landlord cannot assess whether the proposed modifications are safe and compliant. The mandatory status ensures that building systems details are always provided.
Question: Will any works be carried out in common areas, risers, roof space, plant rooms or areas outside the demised premises?
Justification: Works in common areas or areas outside the demised premises affect the building's shared infrastructure and the rights of other occupants. The landlord needs to assess these impacts and may require additional consents or conditions. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the impact on shared areas. The mandatory status ensures that common area works are always identified.
Question: Please identify each common or shared area affected and describe the works proposed there
Justification: When works in common areas are proposed, the landlord needs specific details about each area affected and the works proposed to assess the impact on the building's shared infrastructure and the rights of other occupants. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the feasibility or acceptability of the proposed works in shared areas. The mandatory status ensures that common area works are always fully described.
Question: Will the works require any permit, licence, consent or notification to a public authority?
Justification: The landlord needs to ensure that all necessary permits and consents are obtained before works commence, as failure to do so can result in legal penalties, stop-work orders, and liability for the landlord. Without this information, the landlord cannot assess the regulatory requirements for the proposed works. The mandatory status ensures that regulatory requirements are always identified.
Question: Who will carry out the works?
Justification: The identity and competence of the party carrying out the works is a critical factor in the landlord's assessment of safety, quality, and liability. The landlord needs to verify that the contractor holds appropriate qualifications, licences, and insurance. Without this information, the landlord cannot assess the contractor's suitability. The mandatory status ensures that the works contractor is always identified.
Question: Proposed works commencement date
Justification: The proposed works commencement date is essential for planning the landlord's review, coordinating with building management, and assessing the timing implications of the works. Without this information, the landlord cannot plan for the works or coordinate with other building activities. The mandatory status ensures that the works timeline is always captured.
Question: Proposed works completion date
Justification: The proposed works completion date is essential for assessing the duration of the works and the period during which the building will be affected. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the temporal impact of the works or plan for the restoration of normal building operations. The mandatory status ensures that the works timeline is always captured.
Question: During which hours will the works be carried out?
Justification: The working hours for the works are a fundamental factor in the landlord's assessment of disruption to the building and its occupants. Out-of-hours and weekend working may require additional services and charges, while standard hours may be less disruptive. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the disruption implications of the works. The mandatory status ensures that the working hours are always specified.
Question: Will the works require noisy operations such as drilling, cutting, breaking out or demolition?
Justification: Noisy operations can significantly affect the amenity of other occupants and may require mitigation measures, restricted hours, or advance notice. The landlord needs to assess these impacts and determine whether conditions are needed. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the noise implications of the works. The mandatory status ensures that noisy operations are always identified.
Question: Please list the noisy operations, their duration and the measures proposed to limit disturbance
Justification: When noisy operations are anticipated, the landlord needs specific details about the operations, their duration, and the proposed mitigation measures to assess the impact on other occupants and determine whether conditions are needed. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the noise risks or plan for mitigation. The mandatory status ensures that noisy operation details are always provided.
Question: Will any part of the building's services need to be shut down temporarily?
Justification: Temporary shutdowns of building services—such as power, water, lifts, air-conditioning, or fire systems—can significantly affect the building's operations and the other occupants. The landlord needs to plan for these shutdowns and ensure that appropriate contingency arrangements are in place. Without this information, the landlord cannot prepare for the service disruptions. The mandatory status ensures that service shutdowns are always identified.
Question: Please identify each service, the proposed shutdown dates and times, the duration and the contingency arrangements for other occupants
Justification: When service shutdowns are anticipated, the landlord needs specific details about each service, the timing and duration of the shutdown, and the contingency arrangements to plan for the disruptions and communicate with other occupants. Without this information, the landlord cannot effectively manage the impact of the shutdowns. The mandatory status ensures that service shutdown details are always provided.
Question: Please describe the housekeeping, dust control, waste removal and site security arrangements during the works
Justification: Site management arrangements are critical for minimizing disruption and maintaining the building's standards during construction works. The landlord needs to ensure that the works are carried out responsibly and that the building's environment is protected. Without this information, the landlord cannot assess the site management risks. The mandatory status ensures that site management arrangements are always described.
Question: Total estimated cost of the works
Justification: The total estimated cost of the works provides the financial scale of the proposed alterations and is relevant to the landlord's assessment of the tenant's financial commitment and the value of the improvements. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the financial implications of the works. The mandatory status ensures that the cost of the works is always captured.
Question: Will the tenant continue to pay the full rent and outgoings to the landlord regardless of the sublet arrangement?
Justification: The tenant's continued payment of rent and outgoings is a fundamental financial protection for the landlord and is typically a core obligation under the lease. This question confirms the tenant's understanding and acceptance of this obligation. Without this confirmation, the landlord cannot be assured of their income protection. The mandatory status ensures that the payment obligation is always acknowledged.
Question: Please explain the proposed payment structure and how the landlord's income will be protected
Justification: When the tenant does not confirm continued full payment, the landlord needs to understand the proposed payment structure and the protections in place to ensure their income is maintained. Without this information, the landlord cannot assess the financial risks of the proposed arrangement. The mandatory status ensures that alternative payment structures are always fully explained.
Question: Who will bear the cost of the landlord's reasonable legal, professional and supervisory fees?
Justification: The cost allocation for the landlord's review process is a practical consideration that affects the landlord's willingness to proceed with the review and the overall financial viability of the arrangement. Without this information, the landlord cannot manage expectations around costs or determine whether to proceed. The mandatory status ensures that cost responsibility is always addressed.
Question: Is a rent deposit, bank guarantee or other security proposed for the incoming occupier?
Justification: Security arrangements are a critical risk mitigation tool for the landlord and provide protection against default by the incoming party. The landlord needs to assess the adequacy of any proposed security and determine whether additional protections are needed. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the risk mitigation measures in place. The mandatory status ensures that security arrangements are always addressed.
Question: Please describe the form and amount of the security, the provider and the proposed release conditions
Justification: When security is proposed, the landlord needs detailed information about the form, amount, provider, and release conditions to assess its adequacy and enforceability. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate whether the proposed security provides sufficient protection. The mandatory status ensures that security details are always provided.
Question: Has the main contractor provided evidence of health and safety competence and a satisfactory safety record?
Justification: The landlord has a duty of care to ensure that works carried out on their property are performed safely and competently. A contractor with a poor safety record poses significant risks to the building, its occupants, and the landlord's liability. Without this information, the landlord cannot assess the safety risks of the proposed works. The mandatory status ensures that contractor safety is always addressed.
Question: Please explain what evidence is outstanding and when it will be provided
Justification: When contractor safety evidence is not yet available, the landlord needs to know what is outstanding and when it will be provided to plan the review process and ensure that all safety requirements are met before works commence. Without this information, the landlord cannot track the outstanding safety documentation. The mandatory status ensures that outstanding safety evidence is always tracked.
Question: Has a risk assessment been prepared for the proposed works?
Justification: A risk assessment is a fundamental safety document that identifies potential hazards and outlines mitigation measures for construction works. The landlord needs to review this assessment to ensure that the works can be carried out safely and that risks to the building and its occupants are adequately managed. Without this information, the landlord cannot assess the safety risks of the works. The mandatory status ensures that risk assessment status is always addressed.
Question: Please confirm when the risk assessment and method statement will be submitted to the landlord
Justification: When the risk assessment has not yet been prepared, the landlord needs to know when it will be submitted to plan the review process and ensure that it is received before works commence. Without this information, the landlord cannot track the outstanding safety documentation or set appropriate deadlines. The mandatory status ensures that the risk assessment timeline is always established.
Question: Are you aware of any restriction, covenant, easement, planning condition or building rule that could prevent or limit the proposed arrangement or works?
Justification: Legal restrictions and covenants can significantly impact the feasibility of a sublet or alteration and may require additional consents or variations. The landlord needs to be aware of any such restrictions to assess whether the proposed arrangement can be approved. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the legal constraints on the request. The mandatory status ensures that known restrictions are always disclosed.
Question: Please describe the restriction and how you propose to deal with it
Justification: When restrictions are identified, the landlord needs detailed information about the restriction and the applicant's proposed approach to assess whether the arrangement can proceed and whether additional consents are needed. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the feasibility of overcoming the restriction. The mandatory status ensures that restriction details are always provided.
Question: Please provide full details so that appropriate checks can be carried out
Justification: When trade sanctions or export controls may be relevant, the landlord needs full details to conduct appropriate compliance checks and avoid engaging with sanctioned parties. Failure to comply with sanctions regulations can result in significant legal penalties and reputational damage. Without this information, the landlord cannot ensure regulatory compliance. The mandatory status ensures that sanctions-related information is always provided when relevant.
Question: Please describe the document required and the proposed terms
Justification: When the applicant requires a direct agreement, deed of consent, guarantee, or non-disturbance arrangement, the landlord needs to understand the specific document and proposed terms to assess the legal and financial implications. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the request or determine whether the proposed terms are acceptable. The mandatory status ensures that direct agreement requests are always fully described.
Question: Please describe the accessibility improvements proposed
Justification: When accessibility improvements are proposed, the landlord needs to understand the nature and scope of the improvements to assess their impact on the building and determine whether they align with the building's accessibility standards and any regulatory requirements. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the accessibility implications of the proposal. The mandatory status ensures that accessibility improvements are always described.
Question: Please describe the expected impact and the mitigation measures proposed
Justification: When the proposal may reduce the building's environmental performance or increase carbon emissions, the landlord needs to understand the expected impact and the proposed mitigation measures to assess the environmental implications and determine whether conditions are needed. Without this information, the landlord cannot evaluate the environmental risks of the proposal. The mandatory status ensures that environmental impacts are always addressed.
Question: I confirm that I am authorised to submit this request on behalf of the tenant and that all information provided is true and complete
Justification: This declaration confirms the applicant's authority to submit the request and the accuracy of the information provided, which is essential for the legal validity of the submission. Without this confirmation, the landlord cannot be assured that the request has been made with proper authority or that the information is reliable. The mandatory status ensures that every submission is accompanied by a formal confirmation of authority and accuracy.
Question: I understand that the landlord's approval, if granted, may be subject to conditions, and that I will comply with those conditions in full
Justification: This declaration ensures that the applicant understands and accepts that the landlord's approval may be subject to conditions, which is a standard aspect of commercial lease consent processes. Without this acknowledgment, the applicant may later dispute the conditions, leading to conflicts and delays. The mandatory status ensures that the applicant's acceptance of conditional approval is always recorded.
Question: I confirm that no sublet, assignment, occupation or works will commence before the landlord's written approval has been received
Justification: This declaration is a critical legal protection for the landlord, confirming that the applicant will not proceed with the proposed arrangement before receiving the landlord's written consent. Premature commencement could expose the landlord to significant legal and financial risks. Without this confirmation, the landlord cannot be assured that the consent process will be respected. The mandatory status ensures that this critical undertaking is always recorded.
Question: I agree to provide any further information, drawings, certificates or evidence that the landlord may reasonably require in order to consider this request
Justification: This declaration ensures that the applicant commits to providing additional information as needed during the review process, which is essential for the landlord to conduct a thorough assessment. Without this commitment, the landlord may be unable to obtain the information needed to make a decision, leading to delays or incomplete reviews. The mandatory status ensures that the applicant's cooperation is always secured.
Question: I acknowledge that the landlord may charge reasonable fees for the review of this request and for any professional or supervisory services required
Justification: This declaration ensures that the applicant acknowledges and accepts the landlord's right to charge reasonable fees for the review process, which is a standard provision in commercial lease consent processes. Without this acknowledgment, disputes over fees may arise later, creating friction and potential legal issues. The mandatory status ensures that the applicant's acceptance of the fee arrangement is always recorded.
Question: Full name of the authorised signatory
Justification: The full name of the authorised signatory is essential for identifying the individual who is making the formal submission and accepting the undertakings and declarations. It provides a verifiable record of who signed the request. Without this information, the submission cannot be properly attributed or verified. The mandatory status ensures that the signatory is always identified.
Question: Position or title of the authorised signatory
Justification: The position or title of the authorised signatory provides context about their authority and role within the tenant organization, which is essential for verifying that the signatory has the authority to make commitments on behalf of the tenant. Without this information, the landlord cannot confirm the signatory's level of authority. The mandatory status ensures that the signatory's authority is always indicated.
Question: Date of signature
Justification: The date of signature is essential for establishing when the formal submission was made and accepted, and it serves as a legal record of the timing of the undertakings and declarations. Without this date, the submission cannot be properly dated or referenced in any legal context. The mandatory status ensures that every submission is properly dated.
Question: Please sign in the box below to confirm the declarations above
Justification: The signature is the formal authentication of the submission and confirms that the signatory has read, understood, and accepted all the undertakings and declarations. It is essential for the legal validity of the request and provides a verifiable record of the applicant's commitment. Without a signature, the submission lacks legal force and cannot be relied upon. The mandatory status ensures that every submission is properly authenticated.
The current form employs a robust mandatory field strategy that prioritizes essential data while using conditional logic to minimize unnecessary requirements. The mandatory fields are well-distributed across all sections, ensuring that the landlord collects the critical information needed for each aspect of the review—from identity and lease details through to financial due diligence, construction planning, and legal compliance. The use of conditional follow-ups is particularly effective: mandatory follow-up questions only appear when relevant, which reduces the burden on applicants whose requests do not trigger those paths. This approach balances thoroughness with usability and reflects best practices in form design for complex commercial processes.
However, given the sheer volume of mandatory fields—well over 80 when including conditional follow-ups—there is a risk that applicants may experience form fatigue, leading to rushed or incomplete responses. To mitigate this, consider implementing a progress indicator that shows applicants how far they have progressed through the form and how many mandatory fields remain. Additionally, a save-and-resume feature would allow applicants to complete the form in multiple sessions, reducing abandonment rates. For fields that are conditionally mandatory, ensure that the conditional logic is clearly communicated so that applicants understand why certain questions appear. Finally, consider whether some mandatory fields—such as the detailed sustainability impact matrix or certain operational questions—could be made optional for simple alteration requests that do not involve subletting or significant building impact. A tiered approach to mandatory fields, where the number of required fields scales with the complexity of the request, could further improve completion rates without sacrificing data quality.
To configure an element, select it on the form.