Reviewing the value delivered over the previous term and aligning on upcoming milestones.
Current Primary Objectives: What were the top three business goals achieved through this partnership in the last 12 months?
Success Metrics: Have the original Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) been met?
Yes
No
Partial
Executive Vision: What are the organization’s overarching priorities for the next 24 months (e.g., digital transformation, cost optimization, market expansion)?
Stakeholder Mapping: Identify any new department heads or technical leads who should be integrated into the roadmap.
A baseline assessment of the existing environment to identify gaps or redundancies.
Category | Current Solution/Vendor | Utilization Rate (%) | Criticality (Low/High) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | ||
1 | Cloud/Hosting | ||||
2 | Data Storage | ||||
3 | Cybersecurity | ||||
4 | SaaS/Licensing |
Legacy Systems: List any hardware or software reaching End-of-Life (EOL) within the next fiscal year.
Human Capital: Are there specific technical skill gaps in your current team (e.g., AI/ML, DevOps, Cybersecurity) that our services could bridge?
Identifying new requirements and exploring technological advancements.
Workflow Bottlenecks: Which manual processes currently consume the most man-hours?
Data Maturity: How is data currently being leveraged for decision-making?
How is your organization's data currently structured for the initiatives we are targeting?
Centralized: We use a unified Data Lake / Warehouse (e.g., Snowflake, BigQuery, AWS).
Hybrid: Some centralized reporting exists, but core data lives in department-specific tools.
Siloed: Information is primarily managed within individual departments (e.g., separate CRM, ERP, and Marketing stacks).
In Transition: We are currently migrating from siloed systems to a centralized lake.
Other:
Scalability Requirements: * Anticipated growth in user base or data volume over the next year (%):
How would you rate the current infrastructure’s ability to handle a 2x spike in demand?
Scalable: Our systems are built for elasticity and can handle 2x+ with minimal effort.
Near Capacity: We can likely handle it, but it would cause performance lag or manual intervention.
Requires Overhaul: A 2x spike would likely cause significant downtime or system failure.
Emerging Tech Interest: Rank interest in the following (1 = Low, 5 = High):
Automated AI Workflows | |
Advanced Predictive Analytics | |
Zero-Trust Security Architecture | |
Edge Computing |
Tailoring additional solutions to meet evolving needs.
Feature Gaps: Which functionalities are currently missing from your existing service tier that would provide immediate value?
Service Level Agreements (SLAs): Does the current support model meet your uptime and response-time requirements for your current scale?
Exceeds Requirements: Responses are faster than expected; uptime is flawless.
Meets Requirements: All benchmarks are consistently being met.
Below Requirements: We are experiencing delays or downtime that impact operations.
Please specify which area requires adjustment: (e.g., "Need faster response on weekends" or "Uptime during peak hours")
Workflow Bottlenecks: Which manual processes currently consume the most man-hours?
Pilot Projects: Is there a specific "sandbox" project or department where a new technology proof-of-concept could be deployed?
Fiscal Year Start Date
Budgetary Allocation: Regarding the upcoming cycle, what is the status of the budgetary allocation for technological upgrades or expansion?
Earmarked: Budget is already approved and allocated for these initiatives.
In Discussion: Budget is currently being drafted/negotiated for the next cycle.
Contingent: Budget is available but depends on specific KPIs or project milestones.
Not Yet Allocated: No formal budget has been set aside at this time.
Unsure: I need to consult with the finance/executive team.
Decision Matrix: Who are the final signatories for contract renewals and expanded service agreements?
Form Template Insights
Please remove this form template insight sections before publishing.
This section moves the conversation away from "maintenance" and toward "vision." By asking for primary objectives first, the form forces a reflection on the relationship's value.
This is where you gather the hard data. By using a table format for cloud, storage, and security, the form identifies where the partner is over-invested or under-equipped.
This section is designed to identify "friction points." Instead of asking "What do you want to buy?", it asks "What takes the most time?"
This is the most direct part of the template. It bridges the gap between the current state and the desired future state identified in the previous sections.
Start with broad, high-level questions to build momentum. Save the granular budget and procurement questions for the end. This prevents "form fatigue" and keeps the user engaged through the initial reflective stages.
The template uses a mix of:
Every question in this form should trigger a specific follow-up. If they mark "High Criticality" for a legacy system, your internal team knows exactly what proposal to prepare for the next meeting.
Mandatory Questions Recommendation
Please remove this mandatory questions recommendation before publishing.
To configure an element, select it on the form.