This section captures essential information about the project developer, methodology, and certification framework to establish credibility and compliance baseline.
Project Developer Legal Entity Name
Developer Registration Number
Developer Corporate Address and Primary Contact Information
Years of Experience in Carbon Markets
Has the developer been subject to any carbon market sanctions or suspensions?
Provide details of sanctions, including dates, issuing body, and resolution status:
Primary Carbon Standard Utilized
Verified Carbon Standard (VCS)
Gold Standard (GS)
Climate Action Reserve (CAR)
American Carbon Registry (ACR)
Plan Vivo
Other
Specify other carbon standard:
Specific Methodology Name and Version
Project Type Category
Renewable Energy
Forestry and Land Use
Methane Capture
Industrial Process
Direct Air Capture
Blue Carbon
Soil Carbon
Transportation
Energy Efficiency
Other
Specify project type:
Project Location (Country and Region)
Is the project located in a developing country as defined by UNFCCC?
Project Start Date
Project Crediting Period End Date
Total Project Area (hectares) or Facility Size
Registry Where Credits Are Listed
Verra Registry
Gold Standard Registry
APX
Markit Environmental Registry
Other
Specify registry name:
Registry Project ID Number
Has the project undergone independent third-party validation?
Validation Body Name and Accreditation Number:
Has the project undergone independent third-party verification?
Verification Body Name and Accreditation Number:
Upload Project Design Document (PDD)
Upload Validation Report
Upload Most Recent Verification Report
This section quantifies the carbon offset potential and rigorously assesses additionality, permanence, and leakage risks to ensure environmental integrity.
Total Verified Emission Reductions (VERs) Available for Purchase (tons CO2e)
Vintage Year(s) of Available Credits
Vintage Distribution and Buffer Pool Allocation
Vintage Year | Available Tons CO2e | Buffer Pool Contribution (%) | Net Available Tons After Buffer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | ||
1 | 2023 | 25000 | 20 | 20000 | |
2 | 2024 | 25000 | 20 | 20000 | |
3 | 0 | ||||
4 | 0 | ||||
5 | 0 | ||||
6 | 0 | ||||
7 | 0 | ||||
8 | 0 | ||||
9 | 0 | ||||
10 | 0 |
Has the project demonstrated financial additionality?
Summarize the financial additionality analysis and evidence:
Explain why financial additionality cannot be demonstrated and justify proceeding:
Has the project demonstrated regulatory additionality?
Summarize regulatory additionality evidence:
Explain why regulatory additionality cannot be demonstrated and justify proceeding:
Has the project demonstrated barrier additionality?
Summarize barrier analysis (technological, institutional, etc.):
Explain why barrier additionality cannot be demonstrated and justify proceeding:
Permanence Risk Rating
Low (e.g., renewable energy)
Medium (e.g., improved forest management)
High (e.g., avoided deforestation)
Very High (e.g., soil carbon)
Describe permanence risk mitigation measures:
Describe permanence risk mitigation measures:
Describe permanence risk mitigation measures:
Does the project have a reversal risk management plan?
Summarize reversal risk management approach:
Has leakage risk been assessed and quantified?
Summarize leakage risk assessment and mitigation:
Justify why leakage assessment is not applicable:
Describe the Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) Plan
Monitoring Frequency (months)
Are credits immediately retireable upon purchase?
Explain vesting schedule or holding period restrictions:
Has the project been reviewed for double counting risks?
Summarize double counting safeguards:
Overall Confidence in Carbon Integrity
Very Low Confidence
Low Confidence
Moderate Confidence
High Confidence
Very High Confidence
Upload Additionality Assessment Documentation
Upload Permanence Risk Analysis
This section evaluates the project's alignment with Sustainable Development Goals and assesses environmental and social impacts beyond carbon mitigation.
Select all applicable UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) this project addresses
SDG 1: No Poverty
SDG 2: Zero Hunger
SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
SDG 4: Quality Education
SDG 5: Gender Equality
SDG 6: Clean Water and Sanitation
SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy
SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production
SDG 13: Climate Action
SDG 14: Life Below Water
SDG 15: Life on Land
SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals
Describe specific contributions to selected SDGs with quantifiable metrics where possible
Has a comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment been completed?
Upload Environmental Impact Assessment Report
Explain why EIA is not required or not available:
Has a Social Impact Assessment been completed?
Upload Social Impact Assessment Report
Explain why SIA is not required or not available:
Does the project involve or impact Indigenous Peoples' lands or territories?
Select applicable safeguards implemented
Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) obtained
Benefit-sharing agreement signed
Cultural heritage assessment completed
Indigenous governance body engagement
Other
Specify other safeguard:
Does the project have a stakeholder grievance mechanism?
Describe grievance mechanism structure and accessibility:
Rate the project's impact on the following environmental and social factors
Significant Negative Impact | Moderate Negative Impact | No Impact | Moderate Positive Impact | Significant Positive Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Biodiversity conservation | |||||
Water quality improvement | |||||
Air quality improvement | |||||
Soil health enhancement | |||||
Local employment generation | |||||
Gender equality promotion | |||||
Community health improvement | |||||
Educational opportunities | |||||
Technology transfer | |||||
Infrastructure development |
Estimated number of direct beneficiaries
Estimated number of indirect beneficiaries
Are there any documented human rights concerns associated with the project?
Describe human rights concerns and mitigation measures:
Does the project contribute to circular economy principles?
Explain circular economy contributions:
Overall Social License to Operate
Very Weak
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Very Strong
Upload Stakeholder Consultation Records
Upload Benefit Distribution Plan
This section details the complete financial structure, calculates true cost-per-ton, and assesses financial risks and returns for informed capital allocation decisions.
Total Investment Amount Required (excluding internal costs)
Price Per Ton CO2e (base contract price)
Comprehensive Cost Structure Breakdown
Cost Component | Amount | Currency | Payment Timing | Notes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | ||
1 | Carbon Credits Purchase | $600,000.00 | USD | On delivery | Main transaction | |
2 | Brokerage Fees | $30,000.00 | USD | At signing | 3% of purchase | |
3 | Legal Due Diligence | $15,000.00 | USD | Upfront | Contract review | |
4 | Technical Due Diligence | $20,000.00 | USD | Upfront | MRV assessment | |
5 | Registry Transfer Fees | $5,000.00 | USD | On retirement | Per registry | |
6 | Insurance (if applicable) | $10,000.00 | USD | Annual | Reversal risk | |
7 | ||||||
8 | ||||||
9 | ||||||
10 |
Total All-In Cost (including all fees and expenses)
True Cost Per Ton CO2e (all-in cost divided by total tons)
Payment Structure
100% upfront
50% upfront, 50% on delivery
100% on delivery
Installment plan
Escrow-based
Other
Specify installment schedule:
Specify escrow terms:
Specify payment structure:
Is there a price adjustment clause for currency fluctuations?
Describe price adjustment mechanism:
Are there volume discount tiers?
Volume Discount Structure
Min Volume (tons) | Max Volume (tons) | Price Per Ton | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | ||
1 | 1 | 10000 | $15.00 | |
2 | 10001 | 50000 | $14.00 | |
3 | 50001 | 100000 | $13.00 | |
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
7 | ||||
8 | ||||
9 | ||||
10 |
Is this investment budgeted in the current fiscal year?
Explain budget source and approval timeline:
Budget Source
Sustainability/Carbon Budget
Operations Budget
CSR Budget
Innovation Fund
Other
Specify budget source:
Have you benchmarked this price against market rates?
Summarize benchmarking analysis and price competitiveness:
Does the contract include warranties or guarantees?
Summarize key warranties:
Is there a refund or replacement clause for invalid credits?
Describe refund/replacement terms:
Overall Financial Risk Rating
Very High Risk
High Risk
Moderate Risk
Low Risk
Very Low Risk
Rate the following financial risk factors (1=Very High Risk, 5=Very Low Risk)
Credit delivery risk | |
Developer counterparty risk | |
Price volatility risk | |
Currency exchange risk | |
Regulatory change risk | |
Reversal risk | |
Liquidity risk |
Financial Risk Mitigation Strategy
Expected Return on Investment (if applicable, as percentage)
Upload Financial Model or Cost-Benefit Analysis
Upload Signed Term Sheet or Letter of Intent
This final section synthesizes findings for executive decision-making and captures formal approval, implementation planning, and ongoing governance commitments.
Executive Summary of Proposal (max 500 words)
Overall Recommendation
Approve
Approve with Conditions
Defer for More Information
Reject
Alignment Assessment with Corporate Strategy
Not Aligned | Weakly Aligned | Moderately Aligned | Strongly Aligned | Perfectly Aligned | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net-zero target alignment | |||||
Science-Based Targets initiative alignment | |||||
Stakeholder expectations alignment | |||||
Brand reputation enhancement | |||||
Regulatory preparedness | |||||
Supply chain resilience | |||||
Innovation leadership | |||||
Long-term value creation |
Has the proposal been reviewed by internal legal counsel?
Explain legal review timeline and outstanding issues:
Has the proposal been reviewed by internal risk management?
Explain risk review timeline and outstanding issues:
Have key external stakeholders been consulted?
Select stakeholder groups consulted
Investors
Customers
NGOs
Local communities
Industry peers
Regulators
Media
Other
Specify stakeholder group:
Is there potential for reputational risk from this investment?
Describe reputational risks and mitigation plan:
Proposed Contract Signing Date
Proposed Credit Delivery Date
Proposed Credit Retirement Date
Post-Purchase Monitoring and Reporting Plan
Will this purchase be publicly disclosed?
Describe disclosure plan and communications strategy:
Will this purchase be third-party verified for sustainability reporting?
Specify verification standard (e.g., ISO 14064):
I confirm that all information provided is accurate to the best of my knowledge
I confirm that due diligence has been conducted according to corporate ESG standards
I confirm that this investment aligns with our corporate sustainability strategy
ESG Manager Signature
ESG Manager Name
Signature Date
CFO or Finance Director Signature (for investments over $500,000)
CFO or Finance Director Name
CFO Signature Date
CEO or Board Representative Signature (for investments over $1,000,000)
CEO or Board Representative Name
CEO Signature Date
Upload Board Resolution or Approval Memo (if applicable)
Does this purchase require shareholder approval?
Describe shareholder approval process and timeline:
To configure an element, select it on the form.