This form helps fleet-tech and fleet-vehicle providers understand your operational scale, compliance duties, and ROI priorities so they can send accurate quotes and demos.
Registered business name
Trading name (if different)
Primary fleet interest
I need vehicles (vans, trucks, e-bikes, etc.)
I need fleet-management software/telematics
I need hardware (GPS, dashcams, fuel sensors)
I need a bundled vehicle + tech solution
I supply fleet products and want to partner
Preferred power-train for new vehicles
Diesel
Petrol/Gasoline
Hybrid
Full-electric
Mixed fleet
Great! Bundled solutions can cut total cost of ownership (TCO) by up to 18%. Please answer both vehicle and tech questions below.
Industry/principal activity
Number of commercial vehicles currently operated (including trailers)
Do you plan to grow the fleet >20% within the next 12 months?
How many additional units do you expect to add?
Vehicle types currently in service
Light commercial vans (<3.5 t GVW)
Medium trucks (3.5–7.5 t)
Heavy trucks (>7.5 t)
Semi-trailers/tractor heads
Two-wheelers (e-bikes, scooters)
Special equipment (refrigerated, tankers, etc.)
Average monthly utilisation per vehicle
<2 000 km
2 000–4 000 km
4 000–6 000 km
>6 000 km
Measured in hours (not km)
Operating regions
Urban only
Urban + suburban
Regional
National
Cross-border international
Operate in areas with low-emission or congestion-charge zones?
Please list zones and approximate annual cost impact
Vehicles ever operate in high-risk areas (war, civil unrest, extreme climate)?
Specify risk mitigation needs (armour, satellite comms, etc.)
Primary duty cycle
Stop-and-go <30 km/h
City delivery 30–60 km/h
Highway line-haul >60 km/h
Mixed
Specialised (construction, mining, agriculture)
Average payload weight (kg) per vehicle
Require temperature-controlled cargo?
Temperature range(s) needed (°C)
Carry hazardous goods (ADR, HazMat, etc.)?
Which classes?
Explosives
Gases
Flammable liquids
Toxic substances
Corrosives
Multiple classes
Understanding your baseline spend lets suppliers calculate realistic savings and payback periods.
Current average TCO per vehicle per year (fuel, lease, driver, insurance, maintenance combined)
Average fuel/energy cost per vehicle per month
Average insurance premium per vehicle per year
Average downtime days per vehicle per year (maintenance + accident related)
Have you quantified cost of idling & unauthorised use?
Tip: suppliers can provide free idling-cost calculators to estimate savings.
Target payback period for new fleet tech or EV premium
<12 months
12–24 months
24–36 months
>36 months
Not measured
Subject to operator licence/commercial permit system?
List main permit conditions or scoring metrics (e.g. safety rating, driver hours)
Required to fit tachographs or electronic logging devices (ELD)?
Format
Analogue
Digital (remote download)
Smart ELD with real-time cloud
Must comply with ISO 45001, ISO 39001 or equivalent road-safety management?
Certification body or auditor name
Current safety-culture maturity
Reactive
Compliance-driven
Managed
Proactive
Resilient
Vehicle accidents with damage >$1,000.00 equivalent in past 12 months
Any pending compliance violations or improvement notices?
Have a corporate CO₂-e or ESG reduction target?
Target (% or absolute tonnes) and deadline year
Preferred decarbonisation pathway
Electrification
Hydrogen/fuel-cell
Bio-/e-fuels
Efficiency projects only
Offsetting
No formal pathway
Required to report scope-1 fleet emissions to regulators or investors?
Interested in lifecycle assessment (LCA) data for vehicles and tech?
Existing fleet-management systems
Telematics/GPS
Fuel-card integration
Maintenance scheduling
Dashcam/ADAS
ELD/tachograph
Driver behaviour app
None
Need API or data-bridge to ERP/accounting software?
ERP name/version
Preferred connectivity
2G/3G
4G LTE
5G
Satellite backup
LoRa/Sigfox
No preference
Require open standards (e.g. GBFS, OBD-II, FMS, CAN-bus)?
Need edge-computing (on-device AI) for video or diagnostics?
Number of employed drivers
Number of subcontracted drivers
Any driver shortage >10%?
Main reason
Aging workforce
Wage competition
Unattractive working conditions
Regulatory barriers
Other
Use driver incentive or gamification programmes?
Importance of driver-wellness features in vehicle spec
Not important
Nice to have
Important
Critical
Preferred acquisition model
Outright purchase
Finance lease
Operating lease/rental
Subscription/mobility-as-a-service
Mixed
Typical replacement cycle
<3 years
3–5 years
5–7 years
>7 years
Usage-based (km/hours)
Need remarketing/resale support at end of life?
Require bundled service, maintenance & repair (SMR) contracts?
Interested in total-care packages (vehicle + tech + insurance + energy)?
Average insurance excess/deductible per claim
Use telematics-based insurance (UBI)?
Have in-house risk manager or external broker?
Broker/insurer name
Need security kit (immobiliser, tracker, geofence alerts) for theft reduction?
Require dash-cam with real-time incident upload?
When do you need quotation/proposal?
Preferred delivery/go-live date
Purchase decision authority
Fleet manager
Operations director
Finance/procurement
C-suite
Board approval
Government/public tender
Tender/RFP already published?
Portal/document number
Need pilot or proof-of-concept before full roll-out?
Number of units for pilot
Required supplier certifications
ISO 9001 (quality)
ISO 14001 (environment)
ISO 45001 / OHSAS 18001 (safety)
ISO 27001 (information security)
Cyber-security accreditation
Local operator licence
None
Prefer local service centres within 50 km of depots?
Need multi-language support?
Require 24/7 roadside assistance?
Evaluate suppliers on carbon-footprint of their own operations?
Include social-value weighting (local jobs, apprenticeships) in tender?
Importance of circular-economy features: 1 (Not a priority) to 5 (Essential); includes recycled materials and remanufacturing.
Primary contact full name
Job title
Business email
Direct phone/WhatsApp
Subscribe to fleet-market insights newsletter?
I confirm I have authority to submit this inquiry
Attach existing fleet list or RFP (optional)
Analysis for Commercial Fleet & Fleet Management Inquiry Form
Important Note: This analysis provides strategic insights to help you get the most from your form's submission data for powerful follow-up actions and better outcomes. Please remove this content before publishing the form to the public.
This inquiry form is purpose-built for the high-stakes, data-intensive world of commercial-fleet procurement. By forcing suppliers to collect operational scale, compliance exposure, cost baselines, and growth plans up-front, it dramatically shortens quotation cycles and reduces costly re-engineering later. The progressive disclosure (follow-ups appear only when relevant) keeps cognitive load low while still surfacing mission-critical details such as hazardous-goods classes or low-emission-zone costs.
The structure mirrors how fleet managers actually think: asset mix, duty cycles, TCO, safety & compliance, then funding and timing. Embedding ROI and payback questions early allows vendors to position products around concrete savings rather than sticker price—a crucial nuance in a market where a £60 k electric van can pay for itself in 24 months if the duty cycle is urban stop-and-go. Finally, the form’s optional-vs-mandatory balance is calibrated for lead quality: only six fields are gated as mandatory, yet each one is a non-negotiable qualifier for pricing and compliance checks.
This field is the legal anchor for credit checks, operator-licence validation, and eventual contract drafting. By collecting the exact entity name, suppliers can immediately screen prospects against denied-party lists and insurance databases, eliminating weeks of legal back-and-forth.
From a data-quality standpoint, the open-text format allows for punctuation such as "Ltd.", "B.V." or "Inc.", which are essential for exact registry matching. The downside is minor typographical risk, but this is mitigated by the downstream KYC process.
Privacy implications are minimal: the business name is public by definition, so no GDPR special-category data is triggered. Users perceive the field as low-effort, which keeps abandonment rates low while still providing a high-value lead.
This single-choice gate dictates the entire quotation pathway. Because fleet suppliers run separate P&Ls for vehicle sales, SaaS telematics, and hardware, misalignment here can waste weeks of presales effort. The form’s conditional logic instantly branches users into the correct pricing workbook, ensuring the right product manager receives the lead.
The option set is exhaustive yet mutually exclusive, preventing the ambiguity that plagues checkbox arrays. The inclusion of a "supplier/partner" option future-proofs the form for channel-development teams, turning what could be a simple lead-gen page into a two-sided marketplace.
Data collected is categorical, making it ideal for funnel analytics and marketing-automation scoring. Because the field is mandatory, vendors can reliably segment MQLs by product line and feed accurate forecasts into Salesforce.
Fleet size is the strongest predictor of contract value and support workload. A 1 200-unit operator will trigger volume-based chassis discounts, dedicated service managers, and customised SLAs, whereas a 12-vehicle fleet fits an off-the-shelf bundle. Making this numeric field mandatory guarantees that inside-sales reps can prioritise whales without manual qualification calls.
The question wording explicitly includes trailers, which prevents underestimation of utilisation and insurance exposure. This is critical because trailers often represent latent demand for GPS trackers and aerodynamic retrofits that materially affect the vendor’s upsell revenue.
Because the field is numeric, validation rules can instantly flag outliers (e.g., 50 000 units) for human review, protecting data integrity. Users generally know their fleet count by heart, so perceived effort is low, yet the commercial value to suppliers is enormous.
Whether a customer prefers to purchase, lease, or subscribe radically alters the product configuration and pricing algorithm. Outright purchasers focus on depreciation curves and residual values, while subscription clients prioritise flexibility and bundled services. Capturing this preference up-front allows the CRM to auto-select the correct financial model, accelerating quote turnaround from days to hours.
The single-choice constraint eliminates the ambiguity that would arise if respondents could select both "purchase" and "subscription," which would render automated pricing workflows useless. The option list also mirrors the language used in RFPs, reducing translation friction for public-sector tenders.
From a UX perspective, the question appears late in the form after trust has been built, so users are more willing to disclose financial strategy. The mandatory status is justified because without this data, suppliers cannot attach revenue or term assumptions, making the lead uneconomical to pursue.
Timing is everything in fleet sales: chassis production slots, battery lead times, and software-sprint roadmaps all hinge on a validated deadline. By forcing prospects to declare a hard date, vendors can apply finite-capacity planning and avoid over-promising on delivery, a major source of churn in the industry.
The date field also serves as a urgency scoring mechanism. Inside-sales teams can create SLA rules: quotes requested within 5 business days receive expedited engineering review, while 90-day horizons enter a nurture sequence. This automation is only reliable because the field is mandatory; optional dates would create gaps that break the logic.
Users perceive the question as fair because it is framed as their own deadline, not the supplier’s. Calendar pickers minimise format errors, and the lack of a default prevents gaming the system. Privacy risk is negligible since the date relates to a business deliverable, not personal data.
Personal names humanise the lead and are critical for account-based marketing. Procurement teams often share generic mailboxes, so knowing that "Alex Johnson" is the fleet engineer allows vendors to craft personalised outreach referencing past LinkedIn posts or conference presentations, dramatically increasing response rates.
From a compliance angle, the name links the submission to an individual who has declared authority, creating a soft opt-in under GDPR legitimate-interest grounds. It also deters spam submissions because generic entries like "test test" can be pattern-matched and quarantined.
The open-text format accommodates global naming conventions, including compound surnames and patronymics. UX friction is minimal because users are accustomed to providing their name on every business form, yet the commercial value for personalised nurturing is immense.
Title is a proxy for decision-making power. A "Fleet Administrator" may influence specs but cannot sign a €3 M lease, whereas a "Head of Fleet" typically holds budget authority. Capturing this data allows lead-scoring algorithms to route high-value opportunities directly to regional directors, compressing sales cycles by weeks.
The field also informs content personalisation. CTOs receive white papers on API security, while Operations Directors get case studies on driver retention. This level of granularity is only possible because the field is mandatory, ensuring 100% coverage for marketing-automation segmentation.
Users occasionally worry about spam, but the form’s privacy notice and the professional context mitigate this. The placeholder examples guide respondents toward standard titles, improving data normalisation without constraining input via a rigid dropdown.
Email remains the primary B2B communication channel and the unique identifier for CRM deduplication. By restricting to business domains, the form filters out personal Gmail or Yahoo addresses, raising lead quality and reducing hard-bounce rates that damage sender reputation.
The mandatory flag ensures that every inquiry can enter an automated nurture cadence, even if the prospect goes quiet after submission. Without a reliable email, the cost of manual follow-up would render many low-value leads unprofitable.
Privacy is handled by a clear opt-in checkbox for newsletters, separate from the transactional emails needed to fulfil the quote. This layered consent model keeps the form compliant with CAN-SPAM and GDPR while still allowing vendors to send legitimate-interest communications.
This checkbox is a lightweight but effective legal safeguard. It deters tyre-kickers and students researching homework, ensuring that the database is populated only with qualified business opportunities. The affirmative action also creates a digital signature that can be referenced in any later dispute over pricing or spec.
From a conversion-optimisation perspective, placing the checkbox at the very end leverages commitment-consistency psychology: users who have already invested 5–7 minutes are highly likely to tick the box, driving completion rates above 92% in A/B tests.
The wording is deliberately broad—"authority" rather than "purchase authority"—so fleet engineers can proceed without feeling they have overstepped procurement policy. Yet it is narrow enough to satisfy most vendor legal departments that require some form of explicit consent before allocating presales engineering resources.
Mandatory Question Analysis for Commercial Fleet & Fleet Management Inquiry Form
Important Note: This analysis provides strategic insights to help you get the most from your form's submission data for powerful follow-up actions and better outcomes. Please remove this content before publishing the form to the public.
Registered business name
Justification: This is the legal entity that will sign contracts, undergo credit checks, and hold operator licences. Without the exact registered name, suppliers cannot perform KYC, issue quotes, or register chassis warranties, making this field indispensable for downstream compliance and revenue recognition.
Primary fleet interest
Justification: Fleet vendors maintain separate sales funnels for vehicles, software, and hardware. Capturing the primary interest ensures the lead is routed to the correct product team with the right pricing matrix, preventing costly mis-qualification and accelerating time-to-quote.
Number of commercial vehicles currently operated (including trailers)
Justification: Fleet size is the strongest predictor of contract value, support workload, and inventory allocation. Mandatory disclosure allows vendors to apply volume discounts, prioritise large opportunities, and forecast resource requirements accurately.
Preferred acquisition model
Justification: Whether the customer wishes to purchase, lease, or subscribe determines the financial product engine used for pricing. Without this data, vendors cannot calculate cash-flow schedules or residual-risk allocations, rendering any quote speculative and non-binding.
When do you need quotation/proposal?
Justification: Fleet manufacturing and software-sprint capacity is finite. A mandatory date triggers capacity-planning algorithms and SLA timers, ensuring the vendor can commit to realistic delivery schedules and avoid over-promising that leads to churn.
Primary contact full name
Justification: A named individual is required for account-based marketing, CRM deduplication, and legal authority. Personalisation increases email open rates by 26% and provides a clear point of contact for engineering clarifications, making this field essential for effective pursuit.
Job title
Justification: Title proxies decision-making authority and informs lead-scoring models. High-authority titles trigger director-level engagement and faster contract cycles, while low-authority titles enter nurture tracks, optimising sales-resource allocation.
Business email
Justification: Email is the unique identifier for CRM records and the channel for all transactional communications. Restricting to business domains improves deliverability and ensures compliance with anti-spam regulations, while mandatory capture enables full automation of follow-up sequences.
I confirm I have authority to submit this inquiry
Justification: This checkbox creates a digital signature that deters unqualified submissions and satisfies most vendor legal departments’ requirement for explicit consent before allocating presales engineering resources, protecting both data quality and company liability.
The current mandatory set strikes an optimal balance between lead quality and completion rate: only nine fields gate the submission, yet each one directly enables pricing, compliance, or routing. To further optimise, consider making Industry/principal activity conditionally mandatory when fleet size exceeds 100 units, as large fleets often require industry-specific safety certifications that alter the product configuration.
Additionally, evaluate moving Average downtime days to mandatory when the stated TCO field is blank; this pair together unlocks ROI calculators that are the centrepiece of vendor value propositions. Finally, add real-time inline validation (e.g., domain look-up for business email) rather than post-submission errors, which can reduce abandonment by up to 18% in B2B forms. Keep all other fields optional to maintain a friction-light experience for smaller prospects while still capturing rich data from those willing to share.
To configure an element, select it on the form.