Zapof

Your Feedback Matters: Teacher Evaluation Form

Teacher's Name:

Evaluator's Name:

Date of Evaluation:

Relationship to Teacher:

Student

Peer

Administrator

Other:

 

Instructions: Please rate the teacher on a scale of 1 to 5 for each question, where:

  • 1 = Needs Significant Improvement
  • 2 = Developing
  • 3 = Competent
  • 4 = Proficient
  • 5 = Exemplary
  • N/A = Not Applicable / Unable to Assess

Section 1: Instructional Planning and Preparation

Question

Rating

A
B
1
1. The teacher clearly defines and communicates learning objectives for each lesson.
2
2. Lessons are well-aligned with established curriculum standards and goals.
3
3. The teacher plans activities and materials that address the diverse learning needs of all students (e.g., varying abilities, learning styles).
4
4. The teacher effectively selects and utilizes appropriate instructional resources and technology.
5
5. Lesson plans include clear methods for assessing student understanding and progress.
6
6. Lessons are designed to effectively utilize instructional time.
7
7. The teacher anticipates potential student misconceptions or difficulties and plans strategies to address them.
8
8. Lessons demonstrate a logical sequence and flow, building upon prior knowledge.

Section 2: Classroom Environment

Question

Rating

A
B
1
1. The teacher fosters a classroom environment where all students feel respected and valued.
2
2. The teacher clearly communicates and consistently enforces classroom rules and expectations.
3
3. The classroom environment encourages active student participation and engagement.
4
4. The classroom is a safe and organized space conducive to learning.
5
5. The teacher uses positive reinforcement and encouragement to motivate students.
6
6. The teacher effectively manages classroom disruptions in a fair and consistent manner.
7
7. The teacher encourages and facilitates positive student-to-student interaction and collaboration.
8
8. The teacher demonstrates awareness of student's emotional well-being and provides support when needed.

Section 3: Instruction and Delivery

Question

Rating

A
B
1
1. The teacher explains concepts clearly and provides relevant examples.
2
2. The teacher uses a variety of instructional strategies to keep students engaged and interested.
3
3. The teacher uses effective questioning techniques to promote critical thinking and deeper understanding.
4
4. The teacher provides opportunities for students to actively participate in their learning (e.g., discussions, hands-on activities).
5
5. The teacher paces lessons appropriately, allowing sufficient time for understanding and practice.
6
6. The teacher regularly checks for student understanding throughout the lesson.
7
7. The teacher provides timely, specific, and constructive feedback to students.
8
8. The teacher adjusts instruction based on student responses and needs during the lesson.
9
9. The teacher effectively integrates technology to enhance instruction and learning.

Section 4: Assessment and Reporting

Question

Rating

A
B
1
1. The teacher uses a variety of assessment methods (formative and summative) to measure student learning.
2
2. Assessment criteria are clear, and grading is fair and transparent.
3
3. The teacher uses assessment data to identify student strengths and weaknesses and adjust instruction accordingly.
4
4. The teacher provides students with opportunities to understand their assessment results and areas for improvement.
5
5. The teacher effectively communicates student progress to students and, where appropriate, to their guardians/parents.
6
6. The teacher encourages students to reflect on their own learning and progress.
7
7. The teacher maintains accurate and organized records of student progress.

Section 5: Professional Responsibilities and Development

Question

Rating

A
B
1
1. The teacher demonstrates professionalism in all interactions with students, colleagues, and the wider community.
2
2. The teacher collaborates effectively with colleagues to improve instruction and student outcomes.
3
3. The teacher communicates effectively and regularly with guardians/parents regarding student progress and concerns.
4
4. The teacher adheres to institutional policies, procedures, and ethical guidelines.
5
5. The teacher actively seeks opportunities for professional development and applies new learning.
6
6. The teacher reflects on their teaching practices and identifies areas for improvement.
7
7. The teacher contributes positively to the overall school community.
8
8. The teacher demonstrates responsibility and takes initiative in their role.

Section 6: Overall Effectiveness and Additional Comments

Overall Effectiveness: Considering all aspects of this evaluation, how would you rate the teacher's overall effectiveness?

1 (Needs Significant Improvement)

2 (Developing)

3 (Competent)

4 (Proficient)

5 (Exemplary)

N/A (Not Applicable / Unable to Assess)

Strengths: Please describe the teacher's greatest strengths.

Areas for Growth: Please identify specific areas where the teacher could improve.

Recommendations/Suggestions: What specific recommendations or suggestions do you have for the teacher's professional development?

Any other comments or observations you wish to add:

Form Template Insights

Please remove Form Template Insights before publishing this form

 

Detailed Insights into the Teacher Evaluation Form

Overall Strengths:

  1. Comprehensiveness: The form covers a broad range of critical domains of teaching practice, from planning and instruction to classroom environment, assessment, and professional responsibilities. This ensures a holistic view of the teacher's performance.
  2. Clear Categorization: Dividing the evaluation into distinct sections (Instructional Planning, Classroom Environment, Instruction and Delivery, Assessment and Reporting, Professional Responsibilities) makes the form logical, easy to navigate, and ensures all key areas are addressed.
  3. Actionable Feedback Focus: The explicit inclusion of "Strengths," "Areas for Growth," and "Recommendations/Suggestions" sections is crucial. This shifts the purpose from mere judgment to professional development and continuous improvement.
  4. Multi-Source Feedback Design: The introductory note explicitly states it "can be completed by students, peers, or administrators." This multi-rater approach (often called 360-degree feedback) is a best practice, as it provides a more balanced and comprehensive view of a teacher's performance than a single evaluator could.
  5. Clear Rating Scale: The 1-5 Likert scale with "Needs Significant Improvement" to "Exemplary" is standard and provides clear distinctions. The inclusion of "N/A" is also important for questions that may not apply to every observation or context.
  6. Specific Questions: Many questions are specific enough to elicit meaningful feedback (e.g., "The teacher plans activities and materials that address the diverse learning needs of all students"). This avoids overly general statements that don't provide actionable insights.
  7. Non-Localised: Adhering to the request, the form is generic and applicable across various educational contexts, avoiding any country-specific or regional jargon.
 

Section-Specific Insights:

Section 1: Instructional Planning and Preparation

  • Strength: Directly addresses the foundational work of teaching. Questions about differentiated instruction, resource utilization, and assessment integration are key indicators of thoughtful planning.
  • Insight: Good inclusion of "Anticipation of Challenges" – this highlights proactive and reflective planning, which is a sign of an experienced and effective teacher.

Section 2: Classroom Environment

  • Strength: Focuses on both the physical and emotional aspects of the classroom. Questions about respect, clear expectations, student engagement, and safety are paramount for effective learning.
  • Insight: "Promoting Collaboration" and "Emotional Support" are vital modern teaching competencies, emphasizing a student-centered and inclusive environment.

Section 3: Instruction and Delivery

  • Strength: This is the core of classroom observation. The questions cover varied instructional strategies (engaging delivery, active learning), critical thinking (questioning techniques), and responsive teaching (checking for understanding, adaptability).
  • Insight: The inclusion of "Technology Integration" is important for contemporary teaching practices, reflecting the increasing role of digital tools in education.
 

Section 4: Assessment and Reporting

  • Strength: Goes beyond just grading to assess how the teacher uses assessment for learning (formative assessment, using data to inform instruction) and effective communication of progress.
  • Insight: "Promoting Self-Assessment" is a valuable addition, fostering student metacognition and ownership of their learning.

Section 5: Professional Responsibilities and Development

  • Strength: Recognizes that a teacher's role extends beyond the classroom. It covers collaboration, communication with guardians/parents, adherence to policies, and personal professional growth.
  • Insight: Questions about "Reflective Practice" and "Seeking Professional Growth" emphasize a growth mindset, which is essential for ongoing improvement. "Contribution to the School Community" highlights the teacher's role as a team member.

Section 6: Overall Effectiveness and Additional Comments

  • Strength: Provides a summative rating while offering crucial qualitative feedback opportunities. The open-ended questions are where the richness of the evaluation often lies, allowing evaluators to provide context, specific examples, and nuanced observations.
  • Insight: The shift from a table to individual checkboxes for the "Overall Effectiveness" question in this section (as you requested) is an excellent design choice for a single scaled item, making it less visually heavy and more direct.

Mandatory Questions Recommendation

Please remove this mandatory questions recommendation before publishing.

 
  1. Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (All Core Instructional and Professional Domains)
    • Why: Each of these sections represents a critical domain of a teacher's role:
      • Instructional Planning and Preparation: This is the foundation of effective teaching. If a teacher can't plan well, their delivery will suffer.
      • Classroom Environment: A positive and safe learning environment is non-negotiable. Without it, even the best instruction can't be fully effective.
      • Instruction and Delivery: This is the direct interaction of teaching and learning. It covers how content is conveyed and student engagement is facilitated.
      • Assessment and Reporting: Essential for understanding student progress, identifying learning gaps, and communicating effectively with stakeholders. A teacher cannot effectively guide learning without robust assessment practices.
      • Professional Responsibilities and Development: This covers the broader professional conduct, collaboration, and commitment to ongoing growth that are integral to being a contributing member of an educational institution.
    • Elaboration: While specific questions within each section are important, the presence of each of these domains ensures a holistic evaluation. Omitting any one of them would leave a significant blind spot in assessing a teacher's overall effectiveness. For instance, evaluating instruction but ignoring classroom management provides an incomplete picture.
  3. Overall Effectiveness (Section 6, Question 1)
    • Why: This question provides a crucial summative judgment on the teacher's performance. While the detailed sections provide granular feedback, this single question forces the evaluator to synthesize all observations into an overarching rating. It's often the most critical data point for administrative decisions and gives a quick snapshot of general performance.
  5. Strengths, Areas for Growth, and Recommendations/Suggestions (Section 6, Open-Ended Questions)
    • Why: These are arguably the most mandatory elements for professional growth.
      • Strengths: Acknowledging strengths is vital for building morale, reinforcing positive practices, and ensuring teachers know what they're doing well.
      • Areas for Growth: This is where specific, actionable feedback lives. Without identifying areas for improvement, the evaluation loses its primary purpose of development.
      • Recommendations/Suggestions: This translates identified growth areas into concrete next steps. It guides the teacher towards specific professional development or changes in practice, making the feedback truly actionable rather than just descriptive.
    • Elaboration: Without these open-ended sections, the numerical ratings, while informative, lack the qualitative context and specific examples necessary for a teacher to truly understand why they received certain scores and how they can improve. They provide the narrative and the "how-to" of professional development.

To configure an element, select it on the form.

To add a new question or element, click the Question & Element button in the vertical toolbar on the left.