Urgent: Fraudulent Third-Party Listing & Counterfeit Goods Reporting Portal

1. Section 1: Authentic Product & Intellectual Property Registry & Infringing Listing Metadata Capture

This section establishes the authentic product baseline and captures comprehensive intelligence on infringing listings. Accurate completion is critical for successful takedown notices and potential litigation. All IP-related fields should be cross-referenced with your internal IP docketing system.

 

Authentic Product SKU/Model Number

Authentic Product UPC/EAN/ISBN Code

Authentic Product Manufacturing Batch Code (if applicable)

Type of Intellectual Property Being Infringed

Primary Trademark Registration Number/Patent Publication Number

Additional IP Registration Numbers (if multiple)

Is the IP registration active and renewed in all jurisdictions where infringement is observed?

 

Please specify jurisdictions where IP protection has lapsed and explain the strategy to address this gap:

Primary E-Commerce Marketplace Where Infringement Occurs

Specific Marketplace Country/Region Domain

Infringing Seller Store Name/Vendor ID

Is this seller a repeat infringer with prior violations documented?

 

Provide prior case reference numbers and summary of previous enforcement actions taken:

Infringing Product Listing URL

Infringing Product Title/Listing Title

Infringing Product Listed Price

Authentic Product MSRP/Current Market Price

Estimated Units Sold (if visible on listing)

Date/Time When Infringement Was First Detected

Geographic Scope of Infringement Impact

Multi-Listing Infringement Tracker (if seller has multiple infringing listings)

Infringing SKU

Listing URL

Listed Price

Estimated Monthly Sales

Flagged for Test Purchase?

A
B
C
D
E
1
INF-SKU-001
https://example.com/product/123
$29.99
500
2
INF-SKU-002
https://example.com/product/124
$34.99
300
3
 
 
 
 
4
 
 
 
 
5
 
 
 
 
6
 
 
 
 
7
 
 
 
 
8
 
 
 
 
9
 
 
 
 
10
 
 
 
 

2. Section 2: Counterfeit Evidence Forensic Analysis & Controlled Test-Purchase Diagnostic Documentation

This section documents the evidentiary foundation for enforcement action. Maintain strict chain-of-custody protocols for all physical evidence. Photographic and video documentation must be timestamped and unaltered. All test purchases should be conducted through controlled accounts not traceable to your organization.

 

Has a controlled test purchase been completed for this infringing listing?

 

Test Purchase Order Date/Time

 

Justify why test purchase is not feasible and describe alternative evidence gathering methodology:

Test Purchase Delivery Date/Time

Test Purchase Account Type Used

Test Purchase Order Number/Transaction ID

Total Test Purchase Cost (including shipping)

Was the delivered product confirmed as counterfeit through visual inspection?

 

I certify that detailed photographic evidence has been uploaded to the evidence repository

Was the delivered product confirmed as counterfeit through material composition analysis?

 

Laboratory or Internal Analysis Reference Number

Does the counterfeit product pose consumer safety risks?

 

Describe specific safety hazards identified (e.g., toxic materials, electrical hazards, choking risks):

Upload High-Resolution Product Comparison Photos (Authentic vs. Counterfeit)

Choose a file or drop it here

Upload Laboratory Analysis Report (if applicable)

Choose a file or drop it here
 

Upload Video Evidence of Unboxing and Authentication Process (if applicable)

Choose a file or drop it here
 

Forensic Authentication Checklist - Rate the following authenticity verification points

Definitely Counterfeit

Highly Suspicious

Inconclusive

Likely Authentic

Definitely Authentic

Product weight matches authentic specifications

Material texture and quality consistent with authentic

Color accuracy compared to authentic product

Logo/trademark placement and quality

Packaging quality and branding accuracy

Security features (holograms, QR codes, serial numbers)

Product functionality and performance

Scent or chemical odor (if applicable)

Detailed Forensic Analysis Summary - Describe all observed discrepancies between authentic and counterfeit product:

Multi-Channel Evidence Collection Log (if evidence gathered from multiple sources)

Evidence Source

Collection Date

Evidence Type

Verified by Legal

Admissible Format

A
B
C
D
E
1
Test Purchase
6/15/2025
Physical Product
2
Web Scraper
6/14/2025
Listing Screenshot
3
 
 
 
4
 
 
 
5
 
 
 
6
 
 
 
7
 
 
 
8
 
 
 
9
 
 
 
10
 
 
 

3. Section 3: Platform Takedown Notice Filing & Intellectual Property Infringement Claim Verification

This section tracks all formal enforcement communications with marketplace platforms. Document every submission, response, and escalation. Different platforms have varying notice requirements and response timelines. Maintain copies of all correspondence in the designated legal hold repository.

 

Type of Infringement Notice Filed

Has a formal takedown notice been submitted to the marketplace platform?

 

Takedown Notice Submission Date/Time

 

Explain the delay in filing and provide anticipated submission timeline:

Platform-Assigned Case/Ticket Number

Internal Legal Matter Number

Did the platform acknowledge receipt of the notice within their stated SLA?

 

Describe escalation steps taken due to platform non-response:

Current Platform Response Status

Has the seller filed a counter-notice or appeal against the takedown?

 

Counter-Notice Received Date/Time

Is this case eligible for platform's expedited brand protection program?

 

Brand Protection Program Enrollment ID

Supporting Documentation Submitted with Notice

Upload Complete Takedown Notice Submission Package (PDF)

Choose a file or drop it here
 

Platform's Stated Reason for Rejection (if applicable):

Has this infringement pattern been reported to the marketplace's dedicated brand protection liaison?

 

Liaison Contact Name and Email

Cross-Platform Enforcement Tracking (if infringement appears on multiple marketplaces)

Marketplace Name

Listing URL

Notice Filed Date

Case Number

Status

A
B
C
D
E
1
Amazon.com
https://amazon.com/dp/EXAMPLE
6/10/2025
IP-12345
Removed
2
eBay.com
https://ebay.com/itm/EXAMPLE
6/11/2025
TMD-67890
Pending
3
 
 
 
 
 
4
 
 
 
 
 
5
 
 
 
 
 
6
 
 
 
 
 
7
 
 
 
 
 
8
 
 
 
 
 
9
 
 
 
 
 
10
 
 
 
 
 

4. Section 4: Brand Equity & Revenue Impact Quantification & Strategic Legal Action Recommendation

This section quantifies the commercial damage and recommends appropriate enforcement escalation. All financial calculations should be based on documented sales data, market analysis, and established valuation methodologies. Recommendations must align with corporate risk tolerance and IP protection strategy.

 

Estimated Units of Counterfeit Sold in Last 30 Days

Estimated Gross Revenue Diverted to Counterfeiter (30 days)

Estimated Brand Revenue Loss (assuming 40% conversion rate)

Estimated Price Erosion Impact on Authentic Product Sales

Number of Authorized Distributor Complaints Received

Number of Consumer Complaints/Returns Due to Counterfeit Quality

Has this counterfeit been detected in your authorized supply chain?

 

Describe supply chain infiltration and affected distributors:

Brand Reputation Risk Severity (1 = Minimal, 5 = Catastrophic)

Recommended Legal Action Level

Is the infringer engaged in large-scale commercial distribution?

 

I recommend referring this case to law enforcement for criminal investigation

Does this case warrant customs recordation in target markets?

 

Target Markets for Customs Recordation

Strategic Legal Recommendation & Justification:

Estimated Legal Costs for Recommended Action

Estimated Timeline to Resolution (in weeks)

Revenue Impact Analysis by Geographic Region

Region

Estimated Counterfeit Units Sold

Counterfeit Revenue

Projected Authentic Revenue Loss

Total Regional Impact

A
B
C
D
E
1
North America
1500
$44,985.00
$17,994.00
$62,979.00
2
Europe
800
$23,992.00
$9,597.00
$33,589.00
3
 
 
 
 
$0.00
4
 
 
 
 
$0.00
5
 
 
 
 
$0.00
6
 
 
 
 
$0.00
7
 
 
 
 
$0.00
8
 
 
 
 
$0.00
9
 
 
 
 
$0.00
10
 
 
 
 
$0.00

5. Section 5: Intellectual Property Enforcement Counsel & Digital Brand Protection Authority Sign-Off

This final section requires authorized sign-off from both legal counsel and brand protection leadership. This form cannot be processed for enforcement action without dual authorization. All signatories must review complete evidence package before certification.

 

Lead IP Enforcement Counsel Name

Lead IP Enforcement Counsel Email

Legal Review Completion Date

Has legal counsel verified that all evidence meets admissibility standards?

 

Identify evidence gaps and required remediation:

Has legal counsel confirmed IP registration validity and jurisdictional coverage?

 

Explain IP coverage limitations and alternative enforcement strategies:

Head of Digital Brand Protection Name

Head of Digital Brand Protection Email

Brand Protection Review Completion Date

Has brand protection leadership confirmed the business case for recommended action?

 

Provide business justification override or request for alternative approach:

Enforcement Priority Level (1 = Low, 5 = Critical)

Does this case require escalation to C-Suite or Board level?

 

Summarize key issues requiring executive visibility:

Lead IP Enforcement Counsel Digital Signature

Head of Digital Brand Protection Digital Signature

Final Authorization Timestamp

I certify that all information provided is accurate to the best of my knowledge and that all required evidence has been properly documented and preserved according to legal hold policies

To configure an element, select it on the form.

To add a new question or element, click the Question & Element button in the vertical toolbar on the left.